Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 2970/2026 — snpen Généré par l'IA

Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of standing or procedural defect under Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.

Numéro de cause Ordinanza — n. 2970/2026 — snpen
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Italie (IT)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal filed by Pinto Luca inadmissible and ordered him to pay procedural costs. The appellant challenged a second-instance judgment from Rome, but the court found no merit in the grounds raised. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without a merits examination, and the appellant was condemned to pay expenses.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 360 c.p.p.; Art. 600 c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if the appellant lacks standing or fails to comply with mandatory procedural requirements, resulting in the dismissal of the request without a substantive review.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
criminal appeal inadmissibility lack of standing procedural defect Code of Criminal Procedure dismissal without merits droit à un défenseur frais de défense excès de légitime défense

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 360 c.p.p.
Art. 600 c.p.p.
Généré par l'IA
Ordinanza — n. 9702/2023 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility because the petitioner signed documents personally instead of using a qualified defense attorney.
Ordinanza — n. 28070/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to personal filing in violation of mandatory defense representation rules.
Ordinanza — n. 33036/2025 — snpen
Appeal dismissed because it was filed personally by the accused rather than through a lawyer.
Ordinanza — n. 3497/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of mandatory defense counsel under new procedural law.
Ordinanza — n. 10197/2023 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of qualified defense counsel signature.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: PINTO LUCA nato a FROSINONE il 23/03/1982 avverso la sentenza del 11/02/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di ROMAudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 17794/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata; Esaminato il ricorso; rilevato che il ricorso è stato proposto personalmente dall'imputato; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 6 ottobre 2025.