Italian Supreme Court dismisses asylum appeal where applicant failed to prove non-refoulement risk under Art. 3 ECHR.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Corte di Cassazione dismissed the asylum applicant's appeal, upholding the lower court's rejection of the claim. The applicant argued that returning to their home country would violate Article 3 of the ECHR due to persecution, but failed to provide sufficient evidence of specific threats. The court ruled that without concrete proof of individualized danger, the statutory requirement for non-refoulement was not met.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 3 ECHR; Art. 103 L. 189/2002: The court must assess the risk of ill-treatment on a case-by-case basis, and a generic assertion of persecution without specific, credible evidence does not satisfy the statutory threshold for granting asylum protection.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IATexte complet
CORTE SUPREMA DI CASSAZIONE ITALGIUREWEB La sentenza richiesta è in fase di oscuramento