Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding admissibility of evidence in immigration detention proceedings due to procedural defects.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal lodged by the applicant against the lower court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence. The applicant argued that certain documents presented during the immigration detention review were obtained unlawfully and should be excluded. The court rejected this claim, holding that the lower court correctly applied the procedural rules governing evidence collection in administrative detention cases.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 113 c.p.p.; Art. 20 l. 89/1983: The exclusion of evidence in immigration detention proceedings is strictly limited to cases of illegal acquisition, and procedural defects in the lower court's assessment do not justify a cassation appeal.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IATexte complet
CORTE SUPREMA DI CASSAZIONE ITALGIUREWEB La sentenza richiesta è in fase di oscuramento