Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Ordinanza — n. 39483/2025 — snpen Généré par l'IA

Cassation appeal dismissed as generic; appeal fails to address sentencing reasoning in second-instance judgment.

Numéro de cause Ordinanza — n. 39483/2025 — snpen
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Italie (IT)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because it was deemed generic and failed to engage with the specific reasoning of the second-instance judgment. The appellant challenged the sentencing under Articles 186 and 337 of the Criminal Code but did not provide a targeted argument against the court's motivation. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay procedural costs and a fine to the Fine Fund.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 366 c.p.p.; Art. 367 c.p.p.: An appeal to the Court of Cassation is inadmissible if it is generic and does not confront the specific motivation of the contested judgment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inadmissible appeal generic grounds sentencing review Cassation procedure procedural costs conduite en état d'ébriété qualifiée quotité de la peine sanctions pénales

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 366 c.p.p.
Art. 367 c.p.p.
Art. 186 c.p.
Art. 337 c.p.
Généré par l'IA
Ordinanza — n. 32318/2024 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal against drunk driving conviction for being merely repetitive of lower court rulings.
Ordinanza — n. 7897/2026 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to generic arguments and lack of specific factual error regarding evidence and sentencing.
Ordinanza — n. 18280/2025 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible for being generic and merely reproducing lower court censure.
Ordinanza — n. 40564/2025 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as appellate court properly evaluated evidence and sentencing without logical flaws.
Ordinanza — n. 25597/2024 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to failure to critically analyze lower court's reasoning.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: CIRILLO FARRUSI GIULIO CESARE nato a BARI il 13/06/1966 avverso la sentenza del 19/09/2024 della CORTE APPELLO di BARIdato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI;R.G. n. 19946/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per i reati previsti dagli artt. 186 C.d.S.- 337 c.p.); Esaminato il motivo di ricorso, relativo alla dosimetria della pena; Ritenuto il motivo inammissibile perché generico rispetto alla motivazione della sentenza impugnata con la quale non si confronta; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 7 novembre 2025.