Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
TT 2018:2 Généré par l'IA

Labor court dismissed claim for failure to supplement incomplete challenge application despite court request.

Numéro de cause TT 2018:2
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Finlande (FI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The labor court dismissed the plaintiff's challenge application because it was not sufficiently supplemented to serve as a basis for proceedings. The plaintiff, representing technical and information staff, failed to provide necessary details even after the court explicitly requested completion. Consequently, the court ruled that the incomplete application could not proceed to substantive review.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

s. 10 of the Administrative Court Act; A challenge application must be sufficiently detailed to serve as a basis for proceedings, and failure to supplement it despite a court request results in dismissal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
administrative challenge application procedural insufficiency court request for supplementation dismissal of proceedings labor court jurisdiction chômage technologique recherche et développement technologique fondation européenne pour la formation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
s. 10 of the Administrative Court Act
Généré par l'IA
labour_2008_24
Labor court dismisses employee claim for non-compliant performance review procedures under collective agreement.
labour_2013_116
Individual employee dismissed from collective agreement suit due to union inaction failure.
labour_2010_106
Labor court dismissed claim for severance pay as it lacked jurisdiction over factual disputes requiring lower court.
labour_2013_113
Labor court dismisses employer's jurisdiction objection because the employer was a union member during the termination event.
labour_2008_1
Labor court dismisses claim for non-reviewable procedural defects and salary system issues under Finnish public service law.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Kantaja ei työtuomioistuimen kehotuksesta huolimatta täydentänyt puutteellista haastehakemustaan siten, että haastehakemus olisi voitu ottaa oikeudenkäynnin perusteeksi. Kanne jätettiin tutkimatta.

KANTAJA

Tekniikan ja Tiedon Toimihenkilöt TTT ry

VASTAAJA

Uudenmaan ELY-keskus