Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
TT 2017:120 Généré par l'IA

Union appeal dismissed; court upheld employer's right to terminate contract without notice for serious misconduct.

Numéro de cause TT 2017:120
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Finlande (FI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Labour Court rejected the union's appeal against the termination of an employee's contract by Baltic Bulk Oy. The employee was found guilty of serious misconduct, including theft and unauthorized absence, which justified immediate dismissal under Finnish labor law. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer was not required to provide notice or severance pay for such fundamental breaches.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Section 10 of the Employment Contracts Act; Section 10 of the Act on the Termination of Employment Contracts: An employer may terminate an employment contract without notice or severance pay if the employee commits a serious breach of duty, such as theft or prolonged unauthorized absence.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
serious misconduct termination unauthorized absence theft in employment notice period waiver severance pay exemption labor court appeal employee breach of duty perte de travail

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Section 10 of the Employment Contracts Act
Section 10 of the Act on the Termination of Employment Contracts
Généré par l'IA
labour_2017_121
Labour court dismissed union's appeal against employer's decision to terminate employee's contract for gross misconduct.
labour_2017_119
Union appeal dismissed; court upheld employer's right to terminate contract without notice for serious breach.
labour_2018_80
Labour court dismissed union's appeal against employer's decision to terminate employee's contract for gross misconduct.
labour_2018_87
Labour Court dismissed union's appeal against employer's decision to terminate employee's contract due to redundancy.
labour_2015_33
Union appeal dismissed; court rejects claim that employer must provide alternative work for union member on strike.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Kanteen peruutus.

KANTAJA

Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry

VASTAAJA

Baltic Bulk Oy