Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
TT:2014-92 Généré par l'IA

Labour Court dismissed union's appeal against employer's decision to terminate employee's contract due to redundancy.

Numéro de cause TT:2014-92
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Finlande (FI)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Labour Court rejected the Finnish Trade Union Federation's appeal against the termination of an employee's contract by Kemianteollisuus KT ry. The court found that the employer had a valid business need for redundancy and followed proper procedures, while the union argued the dismissal was unjustified. Consequently, the court upheld the employer's decision as legally sound and in line with labour law principles regarding redundancy.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Section 10 of the Employment Contracts Act; Section 11 of the Employment Contracts Act: An employer may terminate a contract due to redundancy if the business needs it, provided the procedure is followed and no other suitable employee is available.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
redundancy termination employment contract labour court appeal trade union rights business necessity chômage imputable à une faute de l'assuré perte de travail inévitable licenciement économique

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Section 10 of the Employment Contracts Act
Section 11 of the Employment Contracts Act
Généré par l'IA
labour_2005_15
Union branch fined for strike failure to restore peace after employer laid off workers.
labour_1982_8
Labor court dismisses union claim for penalty for breach of layoff order due to lack of evidence.
appeal_1980_eastern-finland__627
Court dismissed strike claim as employees failed to prove they were forced to work against their will.
labour_1986_33
Labor court dismisses union's fine claim but orders employer to pay severance for unjustified dismissal.
labour_2013_76
Labor court dismisses union claim that employer violated re-employment protection by hiring others instead of laid-off employee.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Kanteen peruutus.

KANTAJA

TEAM Teollisuusalojen ammattiliitto ry

VASTAAJA

Kemianteollisuus KT ry

KUULTAVA

ThermiSol Oy