TT:2014-5 Généré par l'IA

Labour Court dismissed union's appeal against employer's refusal to grant collective bargaining rights to a specific business name.

Numéro de cause TT:2014-5

Autorité / Tribunal Työtuomioistuin

Juridiction

Finlande (FI)

Date de la décision 10.01.2014

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Labour Court rejected the Finnish Electrical Trades Union's appeal against the employer's decision to deny collective bargaining rights to 'A SeaWatt'. The union argued that the business name represented a distinct entity entitled to representation, while the employer contended it was merely a trade name without independent legal personality. The court ruled that the name did not constitute a separate legal entity capable of concluding a collective agreement, thereby upholding the employer's position.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Section 1 of the Collective Agreements Act; Section 2 of the Collective Agreements Act: A trade name or business designation does not create a separate legal entity entitled to conclude a collective agreement; only a distinct legal person or employer organization may do so.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

collective bargaining rights trade name legal status employer organization union representation collective agreements act dépens de mandataire professionnel principe de la couverture des frais sûretés en garantie des dépens