Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft, rejecting argument that stolen goods were returned before trial.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Pärnu District Court dismissed the defendant's appeal against his criminal conviction for theft. The defendant argued that the stolen goods had been returned to the victim before the trial concluded, which should have mitigated the severity of the crime. The court rejected this claim, ruling that the return of property does not negate the commission of the theft or justify overturning the final judgment.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IACriminal Procedure Code § 329; Criminal Code § 169: The return of stolen goods prior to the conclusion of criminal proceedings does not constitute a ground for quashing a final judgment of conviction.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IATexte complet
!" # $ " " % & ' $# % ( )(* + "+ " + ,, % "+ --+ % ( $ , ! !$ &"
% .
% ( + -- /& 0 1
$% $ % "
2 & "& 0 $ " ---+ $ $ 2 $ % "+ $ "+ $ 0$ 2 % + ,, ( " /$ 2 % ,, " + % ( ,,$ % -" " "+ ,, + 3 +$ & ( + "%%
( + % % ( & % "$ & $,, +$ $ 4% % %
& $ & --+ + $ $+ ,, 1 / % "& " - " "% % "& ( + - " "% 5+ - ,,% $
6 1 / % $ 11 0 % / % $ 0 % $ 0
.
! /& 0 % % ( + - ) * " "%% - ) * "
% "
--+ , $
"+& " $ ) $$* &