Court dismisses appeal against prosecutor's order to return seized property to the victim.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Tallinn District Court rejected Maria Prõtkova's appeal against the State Prosecutor's order to return seized property. The prosecutor determined that the items were not evidence of a crime but belonged to the victim, warranting their return. The court upheld this decision, ruling that the prosecutor acted within its authority to manage seized assets based on the nature of the items.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IACriminal Procedure Code § 199; Criminal Procedure Code § 200: The prosecutor may order the return of seized property if it is determined to belong to the victim and is not evidence of a crime, and such orders are subject to judicial review.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IATexte complet
1-08-16206
K O H T U M Ä Ä R U S
Kohus Tallinna Ringkonnakohus Määruse tegemise aeg ja koht
10. 12. 2008. a Tallinn, kirjalik menetlus Alustamata kriminaalasja number 1-08-16206 (08230105200) Kohtunik Malle Preimer Vaidlustatud lahend Riigiprokuratuuri 20. 10. 2008. a määrus Kaebuse esitajad ja kaebuste liik Maria Prõtkova, kaebus RESOLUTSIOON Jätta Maria Prõtkova kaebus Riigiprokuratuuri 20. 10. 2008. a määruse peale sisuliselt läbi vaatamata ja tagastada kaebus selle esitajale.