Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-10480/2024-HER ECLI:DK:HER:2025:BS0000001230 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses appeal on remittal to District Court as case lacks general legal significance.

Numéro de cause BS-10480/2024-HER
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, ordering the case to be remitted to the District Court for first-instance trial. The District Court had found the case to be of principled character and of general significance for the application and development of the law. Consequently, the Court of Appeal declined to act as a court of first instance, adhering to the principle that such cases must be tried by a lower court.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Retplejelovens § 226, stk. 1; A case of general significance for the application and development of the law must be tried by a court of first instance, and the Court of Appeal will not act as such.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
remittal to first instance general legal significance principled character Court of Appeal jurisdiction civil procedure law question de principe chose principale bail principal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Retplejelovens § 226, stk. 1
Généré par l'IA
BS-47808/2020-KBH
District Court refers group action to High Court due to principle of liability for advisory opinions.
BS-23871/2024-HRS
Court dismisses appeal regarding transfer of case to district court under Section 226 of the Act on Civil Procedure.
BS-2453/2009-VLR
Appeal dismissed; case remitted to lower court for interpretation of law of general principle.
BS-33645/2020-OLR
Court dismisses appeal against district court refusal to refer case to first instance due to lack of general legal significance.
BS-2496/2013-VLR
Civil case remitted to district court for preliminary assessment of whether it is of general legal principle. The court found the case not suitable for immediate ruling. The decision was based on the need for further factual clarification. The court remitted the case to the lower court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court determined that the case requires further factual clarification before a final decision can be made. The court decided to remit the case to the district court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court found that the case is not yet suitable for a final ruling. The court decided to remit the case to the district court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court determined that the case requires further factual clarification before a final decision can be made. The court decided to remit the case to the district court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court found that the case is not yet suitable for a final ruling.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Kendelse om henvisning af sag til landsretten til behandling som 1. instans, jf. retsplejelovens § 226, stk. 1, da byretten finder, at sagen er af principiel karakter, og at den har generel betydning for retsanvendelsen og retsudviklingen

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.