Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
SS-27293/2019-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2025:SS0000000386 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses appeal regarding illegal expiration of prosecution for drug offense under Danish Criminal Law.

Numéro de cause SS-27293/2019-KBH
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the appeal against the decision on lawful expiration of prosecution for a drug-related offense. The prosecution alleged violations of the Criminal Law and drug legislation, while the defense argued the statute of limitations had expired. The court ruled that the procedural requirements for expiration were met, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1; The court established that the prosecution for drug offenses expires according to statutory time limits if no action is taken within the prescribed period.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
lawful expiration of prosecution drug offenses Criminal Law Denmark statute of limitations criminal appeal procedural dismissal euphoric substances retrait de l'annulation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1
tiltale for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1, og lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer
lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer
1, og lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer
Généré par l'IA
SS-229/2022-OLR
Appeal dismissed as late; prosecution failed to meet strict time limits for enforcing Danish sentence.
SS-1190/2021-OLR
Appeal dismissed because defendant failed to appear without documented legal excuse in criminal proceedings.
SS-483/2009-OLR
Appeal dismissed because prosecution failed to meet strict deadline for filing appeal against defendant.
SS-176/2025-GLR
Appeal dismissed because defendant failed to prove lawful absence from court without valid excuse.
BS-1923/2016-OLR
Appeal allowed because digital filing after office hours counts as timely under new statute.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Sag om anke og lovligt forfald, vedr. tiltale for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 245, stk. 1, jf. § 247, stk. 1, og lovgivningen om euforiserende stoffer

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.