Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
SS-1350/2008-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2025:SS0000000092 Généré par l'IA

Search, visitation, and seizure ordered by police were declared unlawful due to lack of legal basis.

Numéro de cause SS-1350/2008-VLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court of appeal overturned the lower court's decision, ruling that the police's search, visitation, and seizure lacked legal justification. The prosecution argued the measures were necessary for investigation, while the defense contended they violated fundamental rights without statutory authority. Consequently, the court declared the specific coercive measures unlawful and ordered the lower court to correct its judgment accordingly.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Straffelovens § 162; Straffelovens § 163: Police measures such as search, visitation, and seizure require explicit statutory authorization; actions taken without such specific legal basis are unlawful.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
unlawful search and seizure police powers limitation statutory authorization requirement fundamental rights violation criminal investigation procedure motif de police faute policière réintégrande

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Straffelovens § 162
Straffelovens § 163
Généré par l'IA
SS-1171/2009-VLR
Seizure of items found during a search is approved by the appellate court.
SS-3250/2011-OLR
Court upholds restriction on defense lawyers' access to new surveillance materials generated after the ruling. Defense lawyers' access to new surveillance materials generated after the ruling is upheld.
SS-827/2009-VLR
Police search approved by court of appeal despite lower court rejection due to procedural error.
SS-253/2013-OLR
Court remands arrest legality review to lower court while upholding search and seizure legality.
SS-1508/2009-OLR
Court dismisses detention order because weapon possession at home does not constitute public place violation.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Landsretten ændrer byrettens kendelse således, at den foretagne ransagning, visitation og beslaglæggelse ikke var lovlig