SS-14996/2021-GLO ECLI:DK:GLO:2024:SS0000001032 Généré par l'IA

Detention conditions regarding risk of influencing proceedings were not met, leading to dismissal of the application.

Numéro de cause SS-14996/2021-GLO

Autorité / Tribunal Retten i Glostrup

Juridiction

Danemark (DK)

Date de la décision 2023-10-25

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the application questioning whether pre-trial detention conditions regarding the risk of influencing proceedings were fulfilled. The applicant argued that specific risks necessitated continued detention, while the opposing party contended that the threshold for such conditions was not met based on available evidence. The court decided against the applicant because the presented facts failed to demonstrate a sufficient risk of influencing the ongoing proceedings to justify the detention measures.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Straffesagens varetægtsfængsling; Risikoen for påvirkning af forfølgningen: Det kræves en konkret og væsentlig risiko for, at varetægtsfængslingen vil påvirke forfølgningen, for at betingelsen for fortsat fængsling kan opfyldes.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

pre-trial detention conditions risk of influencing proceedings criminal procedure law detention justification procedural safeguards conditions de détention provisoire séquestre investigatoire statut de collaborateur de renseignement

Généré par l'IA

SS-3071/2023-OLR

Appeal dismissed; detention conditions regarding interference risk with prosecution not met.

SS-681/2008-VIB

Court denies bail for suspect in serious crime case due to flight risk and public safety concerns.

SS-356/2008-ESB

Detention continued under s. 769 Ls. dismissed because conditions for continued detention were not met.

SS-2570/2009-VLR

Court orders continued pre-trial detention for defendant pending final judgment on criminal charges.

SS-2116/2008-NAE

Court dismisses appeal regarding police letter and visit control legality after pre-trial detention. Police argued necessity for security; court found no violation. Appeal dismissed due to lack of procedural error.