Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-27012/2023-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2024:BS0000000965 Généré par l'IA

Denmark Supreme Court dismissed human rights claims regarding refusal of case reopening. The court found no violation of ECHR Article 8 or Convention Articles 3, 20.

Numéro de cause BS-27012/2023-OLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court declined to reopen the proceedings, determining that the refusal to do so did not constitute a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights or the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The applicant argued that the lower court's decision infringed upon their rights, but the higher court found no such breach based on the specific circumstances. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, upholding the original procedural outcome.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ECHR Art. 8; UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Art. 3, 20: A refusal to reopen proceedings does not constitute a violation of human rights or children's rights if the original decision was lawful and proportionate.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
case reopening refusal European Convention Article 8 UN Convention Rights of Child procedural fairness violation human rights claim dismissal regroupement familial inversé réouverture de la procédure d'asile classement de la procédure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ECHR Article 8
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 3
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 20
Art. 8 eller
Art. 3 og
Généré par l'IA
BS-7042/2024-VLR
Appeal dismissed because leave from the Procedure Permission Board was required under the Rules of Civil Procedure but not obtained.
BS-61216/2023-OLR
Court reverses family court ruling on child abduction, allowing child to remain with mother against father's return claim.
SS-3473/2022-OLR
Appeal dismissed because medical evidence failed to prove lawful expiration of the detention order.
BS-9/2014-HJR
Court dismisses appeal on costs as original appeal covered entire lower court decision including costs.
BS-1718/2011-OLR
Appeal dismissed; parole denied due to inability to assess treatment needs and high recidivism risk.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Landsretten genoptog ikke sagen, idet man ikke anså afslag på genoptagelse for at udgøre en krænkelse af hverken Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonventions artikel 8 eller Børnekonventionens artikel 3 og artikel 20

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.