Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-2119/2006-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:BS0000000863 Généré par l'IA

New filing after first dismissal rejected as exceeding the statutory time limit for initiating proceedings.

Numéro de cause BS-2119/2006-VLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request to initiate new proceedings following a prior rejection. The plaintiff argued that the delay was justified by unforeseen circumstances, while the opposing party contended the filing strictly violated the procedural deadline. The court ruled that the statutory time limit is mandatory and cannot be extended without specific statutory grounds, leading to the dismissal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Retplejeloven § 253, stk. 1 og 2; The statutory time limit for initiating civil proceedings is a mandatory requirement that cannot be extended by the parties or the court absent specific statutory exceptions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procedural time limit initiation of proceedings statutory deadline first instance dismissal civil procedure law délais de procédure demande tardive de prolongation délai de révision

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Retplejeloven § 253, stk. 1 og 2
Généré par l'IA
BS-260/2007-HJR
Supreme Court allows new lawsuit filing after dismissal by extending the statute of limitations period.
BS-1322/2010-OLR
Appeal court overturns dismissal of small claims case due to non-attendance at a permitted telephone hearing.
BS-1504/2014-VLR
Court dismissed appeal as bankruptcy filing deadline under Section 81 of the Bankruptcy Act was not met.
BS-1577/2007-OLR
Appeal dismissed for non-appearance; failure to appear at hearing triggers automatic dismissal under procedural law.
BS-327/2007-HJR
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds, rejecting new arguments after residence permit granted.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Sag om, hvorvidt sagsanlæggelse på ny, efter landsrettens første afvisningsbeslutning, overholder søgsmålsfristen, jf. retsplejelovens § 253, stk. 1 og 2