Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-1410/2006-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2022:BS0000000326 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses appeal to reopen child custody case due to lack of new evidence and procedural bar.

Numéro de cause BS-1410/2006-OLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the appellant's request to reopen the child custody proceedings from 2006. The appellant argued that new circumstances regarding the child's well-being had arisen since the original judgment, while the respondent maintained the finality of the decision. The court ruled that no new facts justified reopening the case under the relevant procedural rules.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Sektion 600 af Forældremyndighedsloven; Sektion 601 af Forældremyndighedsloven: A final custody judgment cannot be reopened unless new facts or circumstances arise that were not available at the time of the original decision.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
child custody appeal reopening proceedings finality of judgment new evidence requirement family law procedure réouverture du dossier reconsidération expertise médicale surannée

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Sektion 600 af Forældremyndighedsloven
Sektion 601 af Forældremyndighedsloven
Généré par l'IA
BS-331/2009-SON
Court dismisses father's appeal as Child Custody Act conditions for reopening the case were not met.
BS-1336/2011-VLR
Court allows appeal against Process Permission Board's refusal of free process due to new income data.
BS-1092/2010-OLR
Appeal against dismissal for missing phone meeting without legal cause; court finds no valid reason for dismissal.
BS-653/2020-OLR
Appeal court dismisses request to reopen case due to lack of legal basis for correcting procedural error.
BS-3507/2014-OLR
Land court allows claim by lifting old statute of limitations decision due to timely interruption request.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Sag om, hvorvidt sagsbehandlingen af den respektive sag kan tages op igen

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (10 sider) Part 1 (Sagsøger)

Part 2 (Sagsøger)

Part 1

Part 2

Part 1 Part 2 Part 2

Person 1

Person 1

Barn 1 Dato 1

Barn 1 Person 2

Barn 1 Barn 1

Dato 1 Part 2

Part 2

Skole 1 Skole 2

Part 1

Barn 1 Dato 1

Part 1

Part 1

Part 1 Part 1 Part 2

Barn 1 Barn 1

Part 1

Barn 1 Person 2 Person 2 Part 2´s

Part 1

Part 2´s

Part 1 Part 2 Part 1 Part 2