Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-2091/2009-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2023:BS0000006219 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses appeal for low-value case lacking Process Permission Board approval under Section 389.

Numéro de cause BS-2091/2009-VLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Court of Justice dismissed the appeal because the lower court set costs below the 10,000 kr. threshold, requiring Process Permission Board approval which was absent. The appellant argued for review of the cost assessment, but the court noted that appeals for such low amounts are procedurally barred without specific permission. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as inadmissible due to the missing statutory authorization.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Section 389, paragraph 2 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; Section 389, paragraph 2 of the Rules of Civil Procedure: Appeals against judgments setting costs below 10,000 kr. require explicit permission from the Process Permission Board, and without such permission, the appeal is inadmissible.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
costs below threshold Process Permission Board admissibility requirement civil procedure rules low value appeal frais de la procédure valeur litigieuse minimale opposition au commandement de payer

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Section 389, paragraph 2 of the Rules of Civil Procedure
retsplejelovens § 389, st.
Généré par l'IA
BS-7042/2024-VLR
Appeal dismissed because leave from the Procedure Permission Board was required under the Rules of Civil Procedure but not obtained.
BS-557/2011-OLR
Appeal against refusal to accept late complaint under tax law section 64 is dismissed as inadmissible.
BS-397/2011-OLR
Appeal court upholds lower court's decision to reopen a small claims case after default judgment. The court confirms the general right to request case reopening under the Code of Civil Procedure. The decision clarifies that small claims rules do not exclude the general reopening provision. The court notes the defendant requested reopening within the statutory time limit. The appeal court affirms the lower court's ruling on reopening the proceedings.
BS-701/2011-OLR
Court upholds lower court ruling allowing name change after corporate merger under company law provisions.
BS-33238/2024-HJR
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for 6,000 DKK costs ruling without Process Permission Board approval under Section 584a.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Landsretten afviser kæremål, da byretten ved afgørelsen af sag har fastsat sagsomkostninger til et beløb, der ikke overstiger 10.000 kr., og afgørelsen derfor kun kan kæres med tilladelse fra Procesbevillingsnævnet, jf. retsplejelovens § 389, st. 2., og sådan tilladelse foreligger ikke