SS-24893/2011-KBH
ECLI:DK:KBH:2023:SS0000000668
Généré par l'IA
Court dismissed appeal against visit control order, ruling it was not an infringement of privacy rights.
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court rejected the applicant's appeal against the visit control order imposed by the police. The applicant argued that the order violated their right to privacy and freedom of movement, while the state contended the measure was necessary for public safety. The court decided the order was lawful because it was proportionate and based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAStraffelovens § 107; Straffelovens § 108: A visit control order imposed by the police on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity is not an unlawful infringement of the individual's right to privacy or freedom of movement if it is proportionate and necessary for public safety.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
visit control order
privacy rights
freedom of movement
reasonable suspicion
proportionality principle
police powers
criminal investigation
droit de visite
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAStraffelovens § 107
Straffelovens § 108
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IABS-4922/2025-VLR
Court dismisses claim that prison visit and release bans violate right to marry under ECHR Article 12.
SS-3/2026-HJR
Supreme Court upheld visit control but lifted visit ban due to insufficient police evidence documentation.
SS-14524/2013-KBH
Court upholds visit control for foreign lawyer due to risk of witness tampering in drug case.
SS-2688/2008-OLR
Appeal dismissed; appointment of defense lawyer contingent on waiving travel expense reimbursement is upheld.
SS-2402/2021-HER
Court dismisses appeal regarding realitetsprøve conditions for deportation under Section 50 of the Aliens Act.
Texte complet
Anmodning om ophævelse af besøgskontrol blev ikke taget til følge