BS-441/2010-VLR
ECLI:DK:VLR:2022:BS0000005308
Généré par l'IA
Court dismissed appeal regarding whether expert judges should assist in handling the case.
Danemark (DK)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Vestre Landsret upheld the lower court's decision to proceed without expert judges. The appellant argued that expert judicial assistance was necessary for a fair trial, but the court found no legal basis to require it. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, confirming the original procedural arrangement.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAs. 240 af retsplejeloven; s. 241 af retsplejeloven: Expert judges are not mandatory unless specifically required by law or necessary for the specific nature of the case.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
expert judges
procedural assistance
Vestre Landsret
civil procedure
judicial review
complexité de la procédure
partie à la procédure
recevabilité du ministère public
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAs. 240 af retsplejeloven
s. 241 af retsplejeloven
Décisions connexes
Généré par l'IABS-569/2014-VLR
Court dismissed appeal against veterinary and transport expert judge appointments in civil proceedings.
BS-1598/2013-VLR
Court dismisses appeal to replace trial judges with expert members due to lack of relevance.
SS-3912/2011-OLR
Appeal dismissed; court upholds lower court's decision to require jury participation for potential combined sentence.
BS-3611/2011-OLR
Appeal dismissed; small claims strict relevance standard prevents new expert evidence from being admissible.
BS-2763/2007-GLO
District court dismisses referral to High Court and three-judge panel request due to lack of precedent-setting issues.
Texte complet
Byrettens kendelse stadfæstet i sag om, hvorvidt sagen skal behandles med eller uden medvirken af sagkyndige dommere