Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-690/2012-ARH ECLI:DK:ARH:2022:BS0000002601 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses appeal regarding interpretation of shared ownership contract terms in Danish property law case.

Numéro de cause BS-690/2012-ARH
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the first-instance decision concerning the interpretation of a shared ownership contract. The parties disputed the meaning of specific clauses within the agreement registered on the real estate. The appellate court upheld the lower court's finding that the contract terms must be interpreted based on the written text and the parties' intent at the time of signing.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Section 1157 of the Danish Civil Code; Section 1158 of the Danish Civil Code: The court established that shared ownership contracts are interpreted according to their written terms and the mutual intent of the parties at the time of conclusion, rejecting arguments based on external circumstances.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
shared ownership contract property law interpretation Danish Civil Code written terms mutual intent appellate review real estate dispute contrat de gérance d'immeubles

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Section 1157 of the Danish Civil Code
Section 1158 of the Danish Civil Code
Généré par l'IA
BS-2108/2012-VLR
Court dismisses transfer request, ruling venue must be Aarhus where the property is located.
BS-1730/2010-ARH
Administrative court dismisses request to transfer case to Copenhagen Court of Appeal on jurisdiction grounds.
BS-24499/2019-HJO
Court dismisses request to transfer case to Aalborg, ruling jurisdiction lies in Denmark under Lugano Convention.
BS-29258/2024-HBK
Court dismisses claim to void settlement under contract law due to lack of fraud or failed conditions.
BS-89/2022-HJR
Supreme Court allows enforcement action at property location court under enforcement law section 487.1.4.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Kendelse om værneting i sag om forståelse af samejekontrakt tinglyst på fast ejendom