Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
BS-566/2014-ODE ECLI:DK:ODE:2022:BS0000002456 Généré par l'IA

Court dismisses request for expert opinion on whether security system meets legal requirements.

Numéro de cause BS-566/2014-ODE
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the request for an expert opinion regarding whether a specific security system complies with applicable regulations. The applicant argued the system failed to meet safety standards, while the opposing party contended it was fully compliant. The court rejected the request because the existing evidence sufficiently demonstrated the system's conformity without needing further expert assessment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act; Section 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act: A request for an expert opinion is dismissed when the existing record already provides sufficient evidence to determine the matter in question.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
administrative procedure expert opinion request security system compliance sufficiency of evidence dismissal of request défaillance du mandataire avis des défauts garantie en raison des défauts de la chose

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act
Section 11 of the Administrative Procedure Act
Généré par l'IA
BS-3423/2014-OLR
Land court upholds lower court ruling allowing isolated evidence collection via expert opinion questions.
BS-14/2006-RAN
Court allows appointment of new expert after original expert's death in civil case.
SS-1457/2008-VLR
Appeal against pre-trial ruling on expert opinion dismissed as no new facts or arguments presented.
BS-17765/2022-OLR
Court dismisses appeal to remove expert report, finding no material errors despite procedural complaints.
BS-7677/2017-BOR
Court allows new expert opinion due to reasonable grounds for different conclusion despite existing report.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Kendelse om formulering af spørgsmål til brug for syn og skøn i en sag om, hvorvidt et sikringsanlæg opfylder krav, samt beslutning om at tage begæring om syn og skøn til følge