Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
SS-2440/2025-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2026:SS0000000133 Généré par l'IA

Seizure of car deemed disproportionate; confiscation order upheld despite claim of unproportionate interference.

Numéro de cause SS-2440/2025-KBH
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court upheld the seizure order, rejecting the applicant's claim that confiscating the vehicle constituted disproportionate interference. The applicant argued the measure was excessive, but the court found no evidence that the seizure was unproportionate given the circumstances. Consequently, the decision to maintain the seizure was confirmed as legally sound.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Straffelovens § 76; Straffelovens § 77: The seizure of a vehicle is not considered disproportionate interference if the circumstances justify the measure and the applicant fails to prove otherwise.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
disproportionate interference seizure of vehicle confiscation order criminal procedure proportionality principle amende d'excès de vitesse dépassement dangereux délit de chauffard

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Straffelovens § 76
Straffelovens § 77
Généré par l'IA
SS-1970/2021-VLR
Court upholds police seizure of car where leaseholder faces significant financial risk from tenant's inability to pay.
SS-1157/2021-SVEef
Court allows police seizure of car where owner could not foresee son's illegal street racing.
SS-1702/2021-OLR
Confiscation of third-party vehicle upheld where owner could not foresee its use for racing.
SS-598/2013-HIL
Court orders confiscation of car despite defendant's financial hardship and need for transport.
SS-1365/2013-ALB
Court approves police seizure of truck as suspect is sole owner and previously convicted of driving while suspended.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Sag om, hvorvidt beslaglæggelse af bil skal ophæves, fordi det må antages at være uforholdsmæssigt indgribende at konfiskere bilen

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.