Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
SS-237/2022-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2026:SS0000000139 Généré par l'IA

Court dismissed appeal regarding failure to document lawful expiration of detention period in criminal case.

Numéro de cause SS-237/2022-OLR
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Danemark (DK)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed the appeal challenging the lower court's finding on the lawful expiration of detention. The appellant argued that the procedural requirement to document the expiration was not met, while the state contended the statutory period was clearly established. The court ruled that the evidence sufficiently demonstrated the lawful passage of time without needing further documentation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Straffesagens lovgivning; Straffeprocedurereglerne: The court held that the statutory requirement to document the lawful expiration of a detention period is satisfied by clear evidence of the time elapsed, rendering additional formal documentation unnecessary.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
lawful detention expiration criminal procedure rules documentary evidence requirement procedural compliance detention period documentation effets du désistement pièces justificatives manquantes retrait de la requête
Généré par l'IA
SS-3224/2022-OLR
Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's refusal to grant alternative protective measures for the complainant.
SS-187/1995-HJR
High Court partially allows acquittal appeals for some defendants in a public order disturbance case.
SS-22880/2022-KBH
Second appeal dismissed; court rejects request for new evidence regarding criminal conviction facts.
BS-18332/2021-ARH
Tenant's right to submit documents to landlord upheld under Danish tenancy law.
BS-47330/2024-ARH
Court dismisses appeal and remands case to lower court for further proceedings on asylum claim.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Sag om hvorvidt lovligt forfald var dokumenteret

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) Orientering fra Domsdatabasen: Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag. Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende afgørelser. De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i Domsdatabasen.