Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
6 B 11/14, 6 B 11/14 (6 C 39/14) Généré par l'IA

Scope of judicial review of telecom regulator's discretion in calculating efficient cost hourly rates under TKG

Numéro de cause 6 B 11/14, 6 B 11/14 (6 C 39/14)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint against the non-admission of an appeal and referred the case to the Senate for substantive judgment, thereby advancing the proceedings. The dispute concerns telecommunications regulation, specifically whether the national telecommunications agency possesses a margin of discretion when determining hourly rates for efficient cost estimation under specific provisions of the Telecommunications Act. The decisive legal basis includes § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO regarding the fundamental significance of the legal question, and § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 TKG and § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG (as amended in 2012) governing the agency's cost-calculation duties and the scope of judicial review.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG; Scope of judicial review of telecom regulator's discretion in calculating efficient cost hourly rates under TKG: The dispute concerns telecommunications regulation, specifically whether the national telecommunications agency possesses a margin of discretion when determining hourly rates for efficient cost estimation under specific provisions of the Telecommunications Act. The decisive legal basis includes § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO regarding the fundamental significance of the legal question, and § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 TKG and § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG (as amended in 2012) governing the agency's cost-calculation duties and the scope of judicial review.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
pouvoir d'appréciation du juge frais de la procédure pouvoir d'examen valeur litigieuse base de calcul réclamation administrative

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the admission of the appeal to the revision instance due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the determination of the value in dispute for the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the determination of the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
6 B 14/14, 6 B 14/14 (6 C 42/14)
Scope of judicial review over regulatory agency discretion in calculating efficient hourly rates for one-time telecommunications fees under the TKG
6 B 12/14, 6 B 12/14 (6 C 40/14)
Telecommunications regulation: judicial review standards for the agency's discretion in calculating efficient service costs under § 31, 32 TKG
6 C 44/14
Telecommunications fee approval: scope of judicial review over regulator's determination of efficient hourly labor rates under § 31 TKG
6 C 41/14
Extent of judicial review of regulatory authority's efficiency assessment of hour rates in telecom fee approvals
6 B 16/14, 6 B 16/14 (6 C 44/14)
Telecommunications regulation: extent of agency discretion in determining efficient cost recovery hourly rates under §§ 31, 32 TKG and standards for judicial review

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the admission of the appeal to the revision instance due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the determination of the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the determination of the value in dispute for the complaint and revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Telekommunikation; Entgeltregulierung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und ggf. inwieweit das Telekommunikationsgesetz der Bundesnetzagentur bei der Ermittlung der Kosten der effizienten Leistungsbereitstellung nach § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Telekommunikationsgesetzes vom 22. Juni 2004 (TKG) bzw. nach § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG in der Fassung des Gesetzes vom 3. Mai 2012 (BGBl I S. 958) in Bezug auf die Stundensätze, die der Ermittlung von (Einmal-)Entgelten zugrunde liegen, einen Beurteilungsspielraum einräumt und nach welchen Maßstäben insoweit die gerichtliche Kontrolle erfolgt.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.