Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 B 14/13, 2 B 14/13 (2 C 11/14) Généré par l'IA

Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion: accounting for budget place-of-service note dwell-time restrictions in bundle position allocation

Numéro de cause 2 B 14/13, 2 B 14/13 (2 C 11/14)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted the plaintiff's revision appeal to the higher court, finding the complaint against the lower court's refusal well-founded. The dispute concerns a damages claim for allegedly unlawful failure to promote a civil servant, specifically raising the question of how to assess hypothetical causality when the appointment of bundle positions is governed by provisions in the budget's place-of-service note that link to specific dwell times. The decisive legal basis for admitting the appeal is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the issue was deemed to be of fundamental legal significance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 13 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 40 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 GKG; Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion: accounting for budget place-of-service note dwell-time restrictions in bundle position allocation: The dispute concerns a damages claim for allegedly unlawful failure to promote a civil servant, specifically raising the question of how to assess hypothetical causality when the appointment of bundle positions is governed by provisions in the budget's place-of-service note that link to specific dwell times. The decisive legal basis for admitting the appeal is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as the issue was deemed to be of fundamental legal significance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dispositions sur la promotion valeur litigieuse provision pour risques et charges réclamation administrative fonction publique révision procédurale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue regarding hypothetical causality in promotion damages claims.
§ 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 13 GKG
September 2002 - BVerwG 2 B 23.02 - Buchholz 360 § 13 GKG Nr.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 40 GKG
Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 GKG
Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.
§ 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F
Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.
Généré par l'IA
2 B 15/13, 2 B 15/13 (2 C 12/14)
Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion and the consideration of budgetary position notes linking deployment to retention periods
2 B 13/13, 2 B 13/13 (2 C 10/14)
Damages for unlawful failure to promote: treatment of budgetary line-item notes in hypothetical causality
2 C 10/14
Damages for delayed police promotion: causality despite unlawful tenure-based selection restriction under Article 33(2) Basic Law and budgetary position limits
2 C 12/14
Damages for delayed civil servant promotion contingent on hypothetical promotion chance under budgetary constraints
2 BvR 811/09
Causality standard for secondary damages claims in civil service promotion disputes under Art. 33(2) GG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue regarding hypothetical causality in promotion damages claims.

§ 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 40 GKG

Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 GKG

Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.

§ 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F.

Procedural basis for the determination of the value in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Die zulässige Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob und ggf. wie bei einer Klage auf Schadensersatz wegen rechtswidrig unterlassener Beförderung im Rahmen der Ermittlung des hypothetischen Kausalverlaufs die - möglicherweise rechtswidrigen, weil an bestimmte Verweilzeiten anknüpfenden - Vorgaben eines Stellenvermerks des Haushaltsplans bei der Ausbringung gebündelter Stellen zu berücksichtigen sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m. § 40, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F. (Beschluss vom 26. September 2002 - BVerwG 2 B 23.02 - Buchholz 360 § 13 GKG Nr. 114 S. 10); die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.