Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 B 15/13, 2 B 15/13 (2 C 12/14) Généré par l'IA

Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion and the consideration of budgetary position notes linking deployment to retention periods

Numéro de cause 2 B 15/13, 2 B 15/13 (2 C 12/14)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (2nd Senate) granted the plaintiff's complaint and ordered that leave to appeal be granted for the case to proceed to revision, as the legal question at issue is of fundamental significance. The dispute concerns a claim for damages based on the allegedly unlawful failure to promote the plaintiff within the civil service. The specific legal issue requiring clarification is whether and how the hypothetical causal chain should be assessed, specifically whether the provisions of a budgetary position note—which link the deployment of consolidated positions to certain retention periods and may themselves be unlawful—must be taken into account in this analysis. The decision relies on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the admission of the appeal due to fundamental legal significance, with the value in dispute determined according to the fees rules in the GKG.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 13 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion and the consideration of budgetary position notes linking deployment to retention periods: The dispute concerns a claim for damages based on the allegedly unlawful failure to promote the plaintiff within the civil service. The specific legal issue requiring clarification is whether and how the hypothetical causal chain should be assessed, specifically whether the provisions of a budgetary position note—which link the deployment of consolidated positions to certain retention periods and may themselves be unlawful—must be taken into account in this analysis. The decision relies on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO for the admission of the appeal due to fundamental legal significance, with the value in dispute determined according to the fees rules in the GKG.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
appréciation du lien de causalité décisions en matière de promotion litige non administratif fonction publique règles budgétaires provision pour risques et charges

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for admitting the appeal for revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m.
§ 13 GKG
September 2002 - BVerwG 2 B 23.02 - Buchholz 360 § 13 GKG Nr.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.
Généré par l'IA
2 B 14/13, 2 B 14/13 (2 C 11/14)
Hypothetical causality in damages claims for unlawful non-promotion: accounting for budget place-of-service note dwell-time restrictions in bundle position allocation
2 B 13/13, 2 B 13/13 (2 C 10/14)
Damages for unlawful failure to promote: treatment of budgetary line-item notes in hypothetical causality
2 BvR 811/09
Causality standard for secondary damages claims in civil service promotion disputes under Art. 33(2) GG
2 C 12/14
Damages for delayed civil servant promotion contingent on hypothetical promotion chance under budgetary constraints
2 C 10/14
Damages for delayed police promotion: causality despite unlawful tenure-based selection restriction under Article 33(2) Basic Law and budgetary position limits

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the appeal for revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

§ 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m. § 40, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F.

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint procedure.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Klägerin ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob und ggf. wie bei einer Klage auf Schadensersatz wegen rechtswidrig unterlassener Beförderung im Rahmen der Ermittlung des hypothetischen Kausalverlaufs die - möglicherweise rechtswidrigen, weil an bestimmte Verweilzeiten anknüpfenden - Vorgaben eines Stellenvermerks des Haushaltsplans bei der Ausbringung gebündelter Stellen zu berücksichtigen sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m. § 40, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F. (Beschluss vom 26. September 2002 - BVerwG 2 B 23.02 - Buchholz 360 § 13 GKG Nr. 114 S. 10); die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.