Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
8 B 45/13, 8 B 45/13 (8 C 3/14) Généré par l'IA

Eligibility of district chimney sweep master's application for alternative zone upon waiver of current appointment under Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act

Numéro de cause 8 B 45/13, 8 B 45/13 (8 C 3/14)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) permitted the plaintiff’s appeal to the higher court, granting the complaint and finding the matter to have fundamental significance. The dispute concerned administrative law, specifically whether a district chimney sweep master appointed to a specific sweeping district may have his application for a different district considered before his current appointment expires, provided he waives the current appointment, potentially under the suspensive condition of his appointment to the new district. The decisive legal issue identified for review is the interpretation of § 10(1) of the Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act (Schornsteinfeger-Handwerksgesetz) in conjunction with § 5(1) of the Chimney Sweeps Act, § 11(5) of the Chimney Sweeps Act, and § 12(1) No. 1 of the Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Eligibility of district chimney sweep master's application for alternative zone upon waiver of current appointment under Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act: The dispute concerned administrative law, specifically whether a district chimney sweep master appointed to a specific sweeping district may have his application for a different district considered before his current appointment expires, provided he waives the current appointment, potentially under the suspensive condition of his appointment to the new district. The decisive legal issue identified for review is the interpretation of § 10(1) of the Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act (Schornsteinfeger-Handwerksgesetz) in conjunction with § 5(1) of the Chimney Sweeps Act, § 11(5) of the Chimney Sweeps Act, and § 12(1) No. 1 of the Chimney Sweeps' Crafts Act.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
réclamation administrative objet du litige nouvelle demande monopole du ramonage condition suspensive réglementation sur les zones à bâtir

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The provision explicitly cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the case.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions cited to establish the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
8 B 5/17
Appointment of authorized district chimney sweep: review of discretionary selection criteria and judicial duty to investigate grading of professional qualifications
1 BvR 2918/09
Time-limited reappointment of district chimney sweep masters as objective professional access restriction justified by EU market access requirements
8 C 15/17
Mandatory individual registration of authorized district chimney sweeps in the craft register despite corporate entity registration
10 B 12/17
Transitional application of expired chimney sweep pension law to pre-2013 retirement claims
III ZR 315/09
State liability for chimney sweep's reliance on expired administrative directive for fire safety clearance standards

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The provision explicitly cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions cited to establish the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Berücksichtigung der Bewerbung eines Bezirksschornsteinfegermeisters um einen anderen Kehrbezirk vor Ablauf, aber bei Verzicht auf die bisherige Bestellung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die vom Kläger geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung zu (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Die Beschwerdebegründung führt auf die Frage, ob es nach § 10 Abs. 1 Schornsteinfeger-Handwerksgesetz (SchfHwG) - hier in entsprechender Anwendung gemäß § 5 Abs. 1 Schornsteinfegergesetz (SchfG) - ausgeschlossen ist, die Bewerbung eines für einen bestimmten Kehrbezirk bestellten Bezirksschornsteinfegermeisters um einen anderen Kehrbezirk vor Ablauf der bisherigen Bestellung zu berücksichtigen, wenn der Bewerber auf diese Bestellung - gegebenenfalls unter der aufschiebenden Bedingung seiner Bestellung für den anderen Kehrbezirk - verzichtet (vgl. § 11 Abs. 5 SchfG; § 12 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 SchfHwG).

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.