Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
8 B 22/13, 8 B 22/13 (8 C 2/14) Généré par l'IA

Municipal supervisory order proportionality and constitutional funding obligations under the guarantee of municipal self-administration

Numéro de cause 8 B 22/13, 8 B 22/13 (8 C 2/14)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff's complaint and admitted the appeal to the higher court, finding that the case holds fundamental significance for the clarification of constitutional principles. The dispute concerned the proportionality of a municipal supervisory order and whether the defendant authority's failure to secure necessary funding for municipal associations in violation of its constitutional obligations under the Hessian Constitution could excuse the plaintiff's financial distress. The court held that it remains to be determined in the appeal proceedings whether disregarding the proportionality of the supervisory measure is compatible with the guarantee of municipal self-administration under Article 28 Paragraph 2 Sentence 2 of the Basic Law, while provisionally setting the value in dispute for the appeal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Municipal supervisory order proportionality and constitutional funding obligations under the guarantee of municipal self-administration: The dispute concerned the proportionality of a municipal supervisory order and whether the defendant authority's failure to secure necessary funding for municipal associations in violation of its constitutional obligations under the Hessian Constitution could excuse the plaintiff's financial distress. The court held that it remains to be determined in the appeal proceedings whether disregarding the proportionality of the supervisory measure is compatible with the guarantee of municipal self-administration under Article 28 Paragraph 2 Sentence 2 of the Basic Law, while provisionally setting the value in dispute for the appeal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
obligation communale proportionnalité autorité administrative collectivité locale administration des finances plainte à l'autorité de surveillance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
The provision cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal on the grounds of fundamental significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
The provisions cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
10 C 1/18
Municipal Supervision Compelling Road Contribution Ordinance to Balance Deficit Compatible with Constitutional Municipal Self-Governance
10 C 13/14
Municipal supervisory directive to raise district levy for budget deficit: limits of state interference with municipal self-administration and financial autonomy
8 C 43/09
State supervision of municipal tax rates under persistent budget deficit: limits of communal financial autonomy and legislative reservation
9 B 72/16
Prerequisite of a valid ordinance for municipal contribution liability and binding effect of Federal Constitutional Court transitional deadlines on parallel state laws
2 BvR 1961/13, 2 BvR 1962/13, 2 BvR 1976/13
Municipal self-administration complaints: inadmissibility of direct attacks on state constitutional court rulings and bar of federal review via subsidiarity under § 91 BVerfGG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

The provision cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal on the grounds of fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

The provisions cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; kommunalaufsichtliche Verfügung; Garantie der kommunalen Selbstverwaltung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Die Rechtssache hat die vom Kläger dargelegte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Das Berufungsgericht hat die Prüfung der Verhältnismäßigkeit der angefochtenen kommunalaufsichtlichen Verfügung für unerheblich gehalten und deshalb offengelassen, ob die von ihm angenommene Haushaltsnotlage des Klägers darauf zurückzuführen ist, dass der Beklagte seinerseits seiner Verpflichtung aus Art. 137 Abs. 5 Hessische Verfassung, den Gemeindeverbänden die zur Durchführung ihrer eigenen und der übertragenen Aufgaben erforderlichen Geldmittel zu sichern, nicht nachkommt (UA S. 17). Im Revisionsverfahren wird zu klären sein, ob diese Rechtsauffassung mit der Garantie der kommunalen Selbstverwaltung gemäß Art. 28 Abs. 2 Satz 2 GG vereinbar ist.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.