Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 B 58/13, 2 B 58/13 (2 C 6/14) Généré par l'IA

Whether circumstances equating a service offense with a theft exclude the mitigation ground of the property's low value

Numéro de cause 2 B 58/13, 2 B 58/13 (2 C 6/14)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for basic significance, allowing the case to proceed to the merits without determining the final substantive outcome. The dispute concerns a disciplinary proceeding against a civil servant for a service offense involving a theft-like access offense, specifically focusing on whether circumstances that justify equating a service offense with a theft offense simultaneously preclude the application of the mitigation factor for the low value of the property. The decision rests on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO and § 67 LDG NRW, addressing the legal question of whether the equivalence between a service offense and a theft offense excludes the recognized mitigation ground of property insignificance, a conflict identified in prior case law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW; Whether circumstances equating a service offense with a theft exclude the mitigation ground of the property's low value: The dispute concerns a disciplinary proceeding against a civil servant for a service offense involving a theft-like access offense, specifically focusing on whether circumstances that justify equating a service offense with a theft offense simultaneously preclude the application of the mitigation factor for the low value of the property. The decision rests on § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO and § 67 LDG NRW, addressing the legal question of whether the equivalence between a service offense and a theft offense excludes the recognized mitigation ground of property insignificance, a conflict identified in prior case law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
accès au terrain valeur litigieuse accusation de vol cas d'exclusion abus de droit circonstance atténuante

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Provision cited as the basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.
§ 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW
Provision cited in conjunction with the federal procedural rule to authorize the admission of the appeal in this specific disciplinary matter.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BVerwGE 116, 308
Juni 2002 - BVerwG 1 D 31.01 - BVerwGE 116, 308 ).
Généré par l'IA
2 StR 218/24
Lack of special public interest affirmation as procedural obstacle in prosecution for theft of low-value items
5 StR 293/25
Qualification of residential burglary in the operative part and application of the minor-value exception to aggravated theft in the sentencing assessment
V ZB 19/12
Scope of property servitude and valuation of appeal object based on incremental property value diminution
5 StR 485/25
Confiscation of stolen goods' value precluded by prior restitution; exclusion of cross-case offsetting due to per-case aggravation ban
3 StR 468/22
Dismissal of low-value theft conviction without special public interest and setting of missing fine day-rates

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provision cited as the basis for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue.

§ 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW

Provision cited in conjunction with the federal procedural rule to authorize the admission of the appeal in this specific disciplinary matter.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Dienstvergehen; Zugriffsdelikt; Milderungsgrund der Geringwertigkeit der Sache; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision wird wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zugelassen (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 67 Satz 1 LDG NRW). Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet zur Klärung der Frage beizutragen, ob Umstände, die die Gleichstellung eines Dienstvergehens mit einem Zugriffsdelikt rechtfertigen, zugleich dazu herangezogen werden können, den in der Rechtsprechung anerkannten Milderungsgrund der Geringwertigkeit der Sache auszuschließen (vgl. Urteil vom 11. Juni 2002 - BVerwG 1 D 31.01 - BVerwGE 116, 308 ).