Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
4 BN 43/13, 4 BN 43/13 (4 CN 4/14) Généré par l'IA

Minimum mandatory zoning provisions for enforceability of project-specific offer development plans affecting third-party properties

Numéro de cause 4 BN 43/13, 4 BN 43/13 (4 CN 4/14)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal, allowing the case to proceed to the appellate stage under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. The dispute concerns the mandatory minimum zoning provisions required for a "project-specific offer development plan" (projektbezogenes Angebotsbebauungsplan) to ensure its full enforceability under § 1 Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB, specifically in scenarios where the plan affects properties not owned by the project promoter. The Court determined that the revision serves to clarify this significant legal question regarding the substantive scope of such specialized urban planning instruments. No final merits decision was rendered in this procedural order, leaving the underlying claim pending for the upcoming appellate review.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 1 Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Minimum mandatory zoning provisions for enforceability of project-specific offer development plans affecting third-party properties: 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. The dispute concerns the mandatory minimum zoning provisions required for a "project-specific offer development plan" (projektbezogenes Angebotsbebauungsplan) to ensure its full enforceability under § 1 Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB, specifically in scenarios where the plan affects properties not owned by the project promoter. The Court determined that the revision serves to clarify this significant legal question regarding the substantive scope of such specialized urban planning instruments. No final merits decision was rendered in this procedural order, leaving the underlying claim pending for the upcoming appellate review.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
plan d'affectation promotion immobilière servitude de restriction de bâtir décisions incidentes prétention de tiers pouvoir d'examen

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the revision due to the need to clarify a significant legal question regarding minimum provisions for project-specific development plans.
§ 1 Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions applied to determine the provisional legal costs value for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
4 BN 45/19
Minimum planning specificity required for a valid building development restriction under § 14 BauGB
4 BN 35.24
Standards for evidence and balancing in project-related land-use plans with general zoning under § 12 Abs. 3a BauGB
4 BN 29/22
Investment interests in the outer zone: weighing requirements and revision admissibility under § 1, 2 Abs. 3 BauGB
4 BN 46/13
Zoning for Specific Projects: Exclusion of Targeted Individual Facility Planning Under Differentiating Regulations of the Building Code
4 BN 27/12
Standing to challenge project-related development plan: precedence of zoning provisions over civil neighbor rights and sufficiency of factual findings for immediate encroachment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the revision due to the need to clarify a significant legal question regarding minimum provisions for project-specific development plans.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions applied to determine the provisional legal costs value for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Mindest-Festsetzungen eines "projektbezogenen Angebotsbebauungsplans"

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Mindest-Festsetzungen ein "projektbezogener Angebotsbebauungsplan" im Hinblick auf die nach § 1 Abs. 3 Satz 1 BauGB erforderliche Vollzugsfähigkeit enthalten muss, wenn der Bebauungsplan nicht nur Grundstücke des Projektträgers erfasst.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.