Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
4 B 43/13, 4 B 43/13 (4 C 2/14) Généré par l'IA

Permissibility of residential construction within the 100-year flood line under healthy living conditions standards

Numéro de cause 4 B 43/13, 4 B 43/13 (4 C 2/14)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG 4. Senat) granted leave to appeal, admitting the revision to the full Federal Administrative Court due to the need for clarification on whether residential construction projects meet the statutory requirements for healthy living conditions under § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BauGB when located within the 100-year flood line (as defined by § 74 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 WHG). The dispute concerned the permissibility of a housing development project situated in an area subject to a 100-year flood probability, challenging the lower instance's assessment of whether such location violates public law standards for residential zones. The decisive legal basis involves the intersection of the Federal Building Code (§ 34 BauGB) regarding healthy living conditions and the Water Code (§ 74 WHG) regarding flood risk zones, specifically the question of whether the mere presence within a 100-year flood line automatically precludes the approval of residential construction without further individual danger assessment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BauGB, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Permissibility of residential construction within the 100-year flood line under healthy living conditions standards: Senat) granted leave to appeal, admitting the revision to the full Federal Administrative Court due to the need for clarification on whether residential construction projects meet the statutory requirements for healthy living conditions under § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BauGB when located within the 100-year flood line (as defined by § 74 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 WHG). The dispute concerned the permissibility of a housing development project situated in an area subject to a 100-year flood probability, challenging the lower instance's assessment of whether such location violates public law standards for residential zones. The decisive legal basis involves the intersection of the Federal Building Code (§ 34 BauGB) regarding healthy living conditions and the Water Code (§ 74 WHG) regarding flood risk zones, specifically the question of whether the mere presence within a 100-year flood line automatically precludes the approval of residential construction without further individual danger assessment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit du logement zone d'habitation besoin en eau alignement base légale évaluation des risques

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision to the Federal Administrative Court due to the need for clarification of a legal question.
§ 34 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BauGB
Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Klärung der Rechtsfrage beitragen, ob die Anforderungen an gesunde Wohnverhältnisse im Sinne des § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BauGB gewahrt sind, wenn ein Wohnbauvorhaben innerhalb einer Linie für ein 100-jähriges Hochwasser (mittlere Hochwasserwahrscheinlichkeit nach § 74 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as part of the procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as part of the procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
Généré par l'IA
10 C 6.24
Compatibility of § 77 WHG floodplain preservation with § 78 Abs. 4 Satz 2 WHG flood protection measures and compensability of destroyed natural retention areas under § 68 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 WHG
7 C 15/13
Water-law flood retention approval: temporal scope of environmental legal remedies and preclusion of late-filed objections under EU directives
7 CN 1/11
Wasserschutzgebietsverordnung: parzellenscharfe Grenzziehung via 50%-Regel und administrativer Vereinfachungsspielraum bei Trennstromlinie
7 A 6/17, 7 A 6/17 (7 A 11/12)
Elbe channel widening validity; flood-risk protection as admission hurdle and procedural limits on methodological challenges to environmental impact assessments
4 B 10/19
Standard of proof for continuous residential use under § 35 Abs. 4 Satz 1 Nr. 5 BauGB

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision to the Federal Administrative Court due to the need for clarification of a legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as part of the procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as part of the procedural basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Anforderungen an gesunde Wohnverhältnisse bei Wohnbauvorhaben innerhalb einer Linie für ein 100-jähriges Hochwasser

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Klärung der Rechtsfrage beitragen, ob die Anforderungen an gesunde Wohnverhältnisse im Sinne des § 34 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BauGB gewahrt sind, wenn ein Wohnbauvorhaben innerhalb einer Linie für ein 100-jähriges Hochwasser (mittlere Hochwasserwahrscheinlichkeit nach § 74 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 WHG) verwirklicht werden soll.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.