Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
5 B 27/13, 5 B 27/13 (5 C 37/13) Généré par l'IA

Reimbursement of Inpatient Private Clinic Expenses: Appropriateness Criteria Under Section 5 BVO BW

Numéro de cause 5 B 27/13, 5 B 27/13 (5 C 37/13)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the defendant’s appeal and reversed the lower court’s dismissal of the revision, ordering that the case be remanded for further proceedings on the merits. The dispute concerned the appropriateness of expenses incurred during inpatient treatment at a private clinic under social law, specifically challenging the reimbursement of costs. The decisive legal basis is Section 5, paragraph 1, sentence 1 of the Baden-Württemberg Social Code (BVO BW), with the court finding a fundamental legal question regarding the criteria for appropriate expenses in such institutions, thereby admitting the revision under Section 132, paragraph 2, number 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO).

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Reimbursement of Inpatient Private Clinic Expenses: Appropriateness Criteria Under Section 5 BVO BW: The dispute concerned the appropriateness of expenses incurred during inpatient treatment at a private clinic under social law, specifically challenging the reimbursement of costs. The decisive legal basis is Section 5, paragraph 1, sentence 1 of the Baden-Württemberg Social Code (BVO BW), with the court finding a fundamental legal question regarding the criteria for appropriate expenses in such institutions, thereby admitting the revision under Section 132, paragraph 2, number 1 of the Administrative Court Rules (VwGO).

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
remboursement de frais établissement médico-social procédure de révision établissement psychiatrique facturation hospitalière licenciement administratif

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Provision cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
Généré par l'IA
5 B 26/13, 5 B 26/13 (5 C 36/13)
Admission of revision on appropriateness of private clinic inpatient costs under public servant allowance law
5 B 56/13, 5 B 56/13 (5 C 7/14)
Reimbursement eligibility of private hospital expenses under public servant maintenance benefit: appropriateness requirement under § 5 BVO BW
5 C 37/13
Eligibility of private hospital lump-sum rates under Beihilfe regulation and inclusion of functional optional services in cost comparison
2 C 78/08
Beihilfe zu Zweibettzimmer-Kosten in Privatklinik: Keine Begrenzung auf Vergleichskrankenhaus-Entgelte bei Wahlleistungen
5 C 36/13
Reimbursement of private hospital costs: inclusion of separately billed services and choice services in the flat-rate comparison under § 7 Abs. 7 BVO

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provision cited as the legal basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der Angemessenheit von Aufwendungen gemäß § 5 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BVO BW bei der stationären Unterbringung in einer Privatklinik zu klären.