Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
6 B 17/13, 6 B 17/13 (6 C 11/13) Généré par l'IA

Parental claim to mandatory non-denominational ethics education under Basic Law

Numéro de cause 6 B 17/13, 6 B 17/13 (6 C 11/13)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's appeal against the non-admission of revision, granting leave to appeal and remitting the case for further proceedings, while the plaintiff prevailed at this procedural stage. The dispute concerns a claim by parents for the introduction of non-denominational ethics education in schools, challenging the lower court's decision to refuse admission of revision. The court found the matter to be of fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, necessitating clarification on whether such an entitlement arises from fundamental rights provisions of the Basic Law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Parental claim to mandatory non-denominational ethics education under Basic Law: The dispute concerns a claim by parents for the introduction of non-denominational ethics education in schools, challenging the lower court's decision to refuse admission of revision. The court found the matter to be of fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, necessitating clarification on whether such an entitlement arises from fundamental rights provisions of the Basic Law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
conflit parental droit à la formation droits fondamentaux motifs de révision congé parental droits procéduraux

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the appeal because the case has fundamental legal significance.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Basis for determining the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for determining the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
6 C 11/13
State obligation to establish a non-denominational Ethics subject in primary schools as a substitute for Religious Education; constitutional limits of parental education rights and equality under Art. 6(2), Art. 7(3), and Art. 3(3) GG
6 B 9/12, 6 B 9/12 (6 C 12/12)
Exemption from school attendance for religious reasons under parental education rights and freedom of religion
6 B 66/16
Denial of admission to public denominational school for non-affiliated minor without parental consent to religious instruction
1 BvR 984/17
Exclusion of non-denominational student from state confession school: conflict between parental religious freedom and the constitutional status of public Bekenntnisschulen under Art. 7(5) GG.
1 BvR 1555/14
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for lack of substantiation regarding failure to establish mandatory school ethics course

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the appeal because the case has fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Basis for determining the amount in dispute for the appeal proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for determining the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Anspruch auf Einführung von Ethikunterricht

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob bzw. inwieweit aus grundgesetzlichen Bestimmungen Ansprüche von Eltern auf Einführung nicht konfessionellen Ethikunterrichts erwachsen können.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.