Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
6 PB 16/12, 6 PB 16/12 (6 P 1/13) Généré par l'IA

Admission of statutory appeal to review works council's statutory right to information on monitoring of working-time regulations

Numéro de cause 6 PB 16/12, 6 PB 16/12 (6 P 1/13)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court's 6th Senate admitted the statutory appeal filed by the works council applicant, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the appellate level for substantive review. The dispute concerns the scope of the works council's right to information under German labor law, specifically regarding the employer's compliance with and monitoring of working-time regulations. The court based its decision on § 83(2) of the Public Employees Data Protection Act (BPersVG) in conjunction with §§ 72(2)(1), 92(1) sentence 2 of the Labor Court Act (ArbGG), finding that the matter presents an opportunity to clarify the legal standards governing the works council's information claims in the context of time-recording and oversight duties.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG; Admission of statutory appeal to review works council's statutory right to information on monitoring of working-time regulations: The dispute concerns the scope of the works council's right to information under German labor law, specifically regarding the employer's compliance with and monitoring of working-time regulations. The court based its decision on § 83(2) of the Public Employees Data Protection Act (BPersVG) in conjunction with §§ 72(2)(1), 92(1) sentence 2 of the Labor Court Act (ArbGG), finding that the matter presents an opportunity to clarify the legal standards governing the works council's information claims in the context of time-recording and oversight duties.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prétention légale enregistrement du temps de travail pouvoir d'examen droit au travail questions relatives à la protection des données informations du secteur public

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen.
§ 92a Satz 2 ArbGG
2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).
Généré par l'IA
5 PB 20/18, 5 PB 20/18 (5 P 11/19)
Scope of works council information rights vis-à-vis statutory negotiation duties under § 77 BPersVG
1 ABR 45/16
Works council information rights: admissibility of appeal based solely on amended claims lacking original detriment (Beschwer)
7 ABR 16/14
Sufficiency of specificity in works council requests for electronic data access and judicial duty to advise
1 ABR 6/16
Works council's right to inspect individual performance targets: lack of necessity and admissibility of retrospective claims under superseded agreements
1 ABR 10/13
Scope of Works Council consultation rights under § 99 BetrVG regarding applications pre-screened by central recruitment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Main ground for the decision to admit the statutory appeal (Rechtsbeschwerde).

§ 72a Abs. 6, § 74 Abs. 1, § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG

Procedural rule determining the start of the two-month deadline for filing the grounds of appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsbeschwerde; Zulassung; Informationsanspruch des Personalrats

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Antragstellers ist gemäß § 83 Abs. 2 BPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG zuzulassen. Die vorliegende Rechtssache gibt dem Senat Gelegenheit, zum Informationsanspruch des Personalrats wegen Überwachung der arbeitszeitrechtlichen Bestimmungen Stellung zu nehmen.

Das Beschwerdeverfahren wird nunmehr als Rechtsbeschwerdeverfahren unter dem Aktenzeichen BVerwG 6 P 1.13 fortgesetzt. Mit der Zustellung dieses Beschlusses beginnt die Rechtsbeschwerdebegründungsfrist von zwei Monaten (§ 72a Abs. 6, § 74 Abs. 1, § 92 Abs. 2 Satz 1, § 92a Satz 2 ArbGG).