Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
10 B 11/12 Généré par l'IA

Breaking through res judicata of an administrative enforcement judgment in refugee law via tortious interference

Numéro de cause 10 B 11/12
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the appeal for revision, granting the applicant relief on procedural grounds without deciding the substantive merits. The dispute concerns refugee law, specifically the challenge to a final administrative court judgment compelling an agency to act, which the appellant sought to overturn by invoking tortious interference. The court ordered that the case be heard by the Federal Administrative Court to resolve the legally significant question of whether and under what conditions the legal force of an administrative court enforcement judgment in refugee matters can be broken through by citing civil law provisions regarding intentional torts.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 826 BGB; Breaking through res judicata of an administrative enforcement judgment in refugee law via tortious interference: The dispute concerns refugee law, specifically the challenge to a final administrative court judgment compelling an agency to act, which the appellant sought to overturn by invoking tortious interference. The court ordered that the case be heard by the Federal Administrative Court to resolve the legally significant question of whether and under what conditions the legal force of an administrative court enforcement judgment in refugee matters can be broken through by citing civil law provisions regarding intentional torts.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
force matérielle exécution administrative réfugié objet du litige décisions incidentes motifs de révision

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for admitting the appeal for revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
§ 826 BGB
unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Rechtskraft eines verwaltungsgerichtlichen Verpflichtungsurteils im Flüchtlingsrecht unter Berufung auf § 826 BGB durchbrochen werden kann.
Généré par l'IA
1 B 70/17
Failure to address conflicting higher administrative court case law on Syrian asylum risk as a procedural defect
10 C 27/12
Revocation of refugee status based on bad-faith abuse of a binding judgment and non-applicability of the administrative exclusion deadline
1 B 98/17
Syrian asylum claimant: inadmissibility of revision appeal challenging divergent appellate fact-finding on risk of persecution for returnees
1 B 58/16, 1 B 58/16 (1 C 18/16)
Admissibility of Revision: Interpreting Interplay Between §§ 26a and 27a AsylG
1 B 22/09
Residency regulation violations: admissibility of revision based on failure to warn against self-incrimination and scope of substantive review

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the appeal for revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Flüchtlingsrecht; Durchbrechung der Rechtskraft eines Verpflichtungsurteils; sittenwidrige Schädigung; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben zu klären, ob und ggf. unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Rechtskraft eines verwaltungsgerichtlichen Verpflichtungsurteils im Flüchtlingsrecht unter Berufung auf § 826 BGB durchbrochen werden kann.