Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
5 B 29/12 Généré par l'IA

Eligibility of state health benefits for heterologous in-vitro fertilization expenses

Numéro de cause 5 B 29/12
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted an appeal on points of law, granting the plaintiff's request for legal status to challenge the denial of state health benefits, thereby ruling in favor of the applicant at the procedural stage. The dispute concerned whether expenses for heterologous in-vitro fertilization are eligible for reimbursement as necessary health treatment under public service employee welfare schemes. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, under which the appeal was admitted due to the question's fundamental significance, leaving the substantive issue of whether such medical procedures qualify for *Beihilfe* to be determined on the merits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Eligibility of state health benefits for heterologous in-vitro fertilization expenses: The dispute concerned whether expenses for heterologous in-vitro fertilization are eligible for reimbursement as necessary health treatment under public service employee welfare schemes. The decisive legal basis is § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, under which the appeal was admitted due to the question's fundamental significance, leaving the substantive issue of whether such medical procedures qualify for *Beihilfe* to be determined on the merits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
frais médicaux prestation de droit public état de santé État providence traitement médical état requérant

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
Généré par l'IA
5 C 32/12
Eligibility of state benefits for heterologous in-vitro fertilization expenses: independent assessment of medical necessity for the spouse versus the official
5 C 18/19
Beihilfefähigkeit für extrakorporale Insektionsmaßnahmen: inapplicable subsidiarity exclusion for non-eligible insured spouse under § 8 Abs. 4 BBhV
VI R 47/15
Deductibility of in-vitro fertilization costs for infertile woman in same-sex partnership as extraordinary medical burden
2 C 40/09
Beihilfe to artificial insemination costs: validity of application-based cost allocation under § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 13 BhV vs. causation principle and equality review
B 1 KR 7/21 R
Statutory health insurance coverage for heterologous insemination in same-sex marriages and the constitutional limits of the homologous-only requirement

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the legal basis for admitting the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Beihilfefähigkeit; In-vitro-Fertilisation

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Beantwortung der Frage geben, ob hinsichtlich von Aufwendungen für eine künstliche Befruchtung in Gestalt einer so genannten heterologen In-vitro-Fertilisation die Gewährung von Beihilfe beansprucht werden kann.