Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
10 B 9/12, 10 B 9/12 (10 C 17/12) Généré par l'IA

Deportation ban: Fundamental significance of danger to the public via custodial sentence under § 60 Abs. 8 AufenthG

Numéro de cause 10 B 9/12, 10 B 9/12 (10 C 17/12)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of a revision appeal to the same court, finding the complainant's complaint admissible and well-founded. The dispute concerned the application of deportation bans under German residency law, specifically whether a final conviction to a total custodial sentence meets the threshold for declaring a danger to the public. The court determined that the case holds fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, allowing the Bundesverwaltungsgericht to further clarify the statutory requirements of § 60 Abs. 8 Satz 1 Alt. 2 AufenthG regarding convictions for at least three years of imprisonment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Deportation ban: Fundamental significance of danger to the public via custodial sentence under § 60 Abs. 8 AufenthG: The dispute concerned the application of deportation bans under German residency law, specifically whether a final conviction to a total custodial sentence meets the threshold for declaring a danger to the public. The court determined that the case holds fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, allowing the Bundesverwaltungsgericht to further clarify the statutory requirements of § 60 Abs. 8 Satz 1 Alt. 2 AufenthG regarding convictions for at least three years of imprisonment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interdiction de renvoi peine privative de liberté danger public condition légale restriction de liberté détention en droit des étrangers

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.
Généré par l'IA
10 B 26/09, 10 B 26/09 (10 C 19/10)
Standards for judicial conviction in constitutional interpretation of deportation protection exceptions under § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG
10 B 18/10, 10 B 18/10 (10 C 24/10)
Constitutionally compliant application of § 60 Abs. 7 AufenthG deportation ban: standards for judicial fact-finding in cases of general dangers
XIII ZB 13/20
Custodial detention for deportation: sufficiency of a danger-prevention order to establish presumed flight risk under the Return Directive
10 C 13/12
Deportation ban for unaccompanied minors: equivalent protection under § 58 Abs. 1a AufenthG prevents circumvention of § 60 Abs. 7 Satz 3 AufenthG
1 C 10.25
Scope of domestic deportation ban under § 60 Abs. 5 AufenthG and exclusion of family ties as grounds for in-country protection

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Abschiebungsverbot; Verurteilung zu einer Gesamtfreiheitsstrafe; Revisionszulassung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben, die Voraussetzungen des § 60 Abs. 8 Satz 1 Alt. 2 AufenthG (Gefahr für die Allgemeinheit wegen rechtskräftiger Verurteilung zu einer Freiheitsstrafe von mindestens 3 Jahren) weiter zu klären.