Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 B 61/11, 2 B 61/11 (2 C 6/12) Généré par l'IA

Restriction of civil servant’s claim to duty-appropriate employment for sole budgeted senior position

Numéro de cause 2 B 61/11, 2 B 61/11 (2 C 6/12)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted permission to appeal the revision based on the fundamental significance of the legal question, thereby remanding the case for further adjudication. The dispute concerns a civil servant holding a senior executive position that is listed only once in the employer’s budget plan, challenging the validity of a restriction on their claim to appropriate service (amtsgemässe Beschäftigung) by that position. The decisive legal issue to be clarified is whether and under what specific conditions the holder of a uniquely budgeted senior position must accept a limitation on their right to duty-appropriate employment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Restriction of civil servant’s claim to duty-appropriate employment for sole budgeted senior position: The dispute concerns a civil servant holding a senior executive position that is listed only once in the employer’s budget plan, challenging the validity of a restriction on their claim to appropriate service (amtsgemässe Beschäftigung) by that position. The decisive legal issue to be clarified is whether and under what specific conditions the holder of a uniquely budgeted senior position must accept a limitation on their right to duty-appropriate employment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droits du fonctionnaire conditions d'emploi droits constitutionnels spécifiques interdiction professionnelle contestation civile profession administrative

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting permission to appeal the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
Généré par l'IA
2 B 27/14
Eligibility for seniority allowance under § 46 BBesG barred by provisional budgetary management constraints
2 B 92/15, 2 B 92/15 (2 C 6/16)
Budgetary preconditions for higher-ranking duty allowance and fiction of task performance during block-model part-time leave
2 C 19/13
Allowance for higher-grade duties under pooled budgetary planning despite lack of fixed post-to-plan-position link
2 BvR 2305/11
Eligibility of "comparable administrative experience" as substitute for civil service qualification in appointment profile for senior administrative role
2 B 21/14
Allowance of a higher-grade office supplement denied under emergency budgeting restrictions despite vacant post

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting permission to appeal the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Amtsangemessene Beschäftigung des Beamten; Einschränkung des Anspruchs

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision der Klägerin ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. In dem Revisionsverfahren kann geklärt werden, ob und unter welchen Voraussetzungen der Inhaber eines im Haushaltsplan seines Dienstherrn nur einmal ausgewiesenen Spitzenamtes eine Einschränkung seines Anspruchs auf amtsangemessene Beschäftigung hinzunehmen hat.