Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
8 B 96/11, 8 B 96/11 (8 C 9/12) Généré par l'IA

Recognition of Austrian Master Builder qualification: Definition of “Architect” under Art. 10(c) Directive 2005/36/EC

Numéro de cause 8 B 96/11, 8 B 96/11 (8 C 9/12)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court ordered the admission of the appeal to the Federal Administrative Court, granting the plaintiff's legal remedy and finding that the case involves a question of fundamental significance. The dispute concerned the recognition of a professional qualification as a "Master Builder" (Baumeister) obtained in Austria for practice in Germany, which had been challenged by the defendant authority. The court determined that the appeal must be reviewed to clarify the specific requirements imposed by Article 10(c) of Directive 2005/36/EC regarding the occupational term "Architect," thereby establishing the legal basis for the substantive review in the revision proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG; Recognition of Austrian Master Builder qualification: Definition of “Architect” under Art. 10(c) Directive 2005/36/EC: The dispute concerned the recognition of a professional qualification as a "Master Builder" (Baumeister) obtained in Austria for practice in Germany, which had been challenged by the defendant authority. The court determined that the appeal must be reviewed to clarify the specific requirements imposed by Article 10(c) of Directive 2005/36/EC regarding the occupational term "Architect," thereby establishing the legal basis for the substantive review in the revision proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
directive sur la qualification clause d'architecte autorité administrative conditions matérielles profession de l'urbanisme procédure de révision

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for admitting the revision appeal due to the presence of a question of fundamental significance.
§ 52 Abs. 4 GKG
1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG
Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
10 C 5/15
Recognition of non-listed vocational qualification as architect under EU Directive 2005/36/EC: “special and extraordinary reasons” requirement and definition of architect profession
8 C 9/12
Interpretation of "specific and exceptional reasons" and professional qualifications for automatic recognition of an architect title under the Mutual Recognition Directive
I ZR 68/09
Use of regulated "Architect" title without local chamber registration: compatibility of national exclusivity requirement with EU freedom of establishment
2 C 9.25
Eligibility of architect-in-training periods as salaried experience for public service officers under the prohibition of prerequisite training
I ZR 172/08
Recognition of Austrian Master's Degree as Academic Title, Not Protected Specialist Designation, in Competition Law Context

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the revision appeal due to the presence of a question of fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG

Legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Berufsanerkennung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde hat Erfolg. Der Rechtssache kommt die von dem Beklagten geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zu. Im Revisionsverfahren wird im Hinblick auf die vom Kläger in Österreich erworbene Qualifikation als Baumeister voraussichtlich zu klären sein, welche Anforderungen Art. 10 Buchst. c der Richtlinie 2005/36/EG mit dem Tatbestandsmerkmal "Architekt" stellt.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 4 GKG.