Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11) Généré par l'IA

Requirements for Urban Planning Justification of Land-Use Plan Determinations to Strengthen Central Supply Areas

Numéro de cause 4 B 8/11, 4 B 8/11 (4 C 13/11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (4th Senate) granted leave to appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, thereby requiring the Federal Administrative Court to adjudicate the merits of the case via revision proceedings. The dispute concerned a complaint for leave to appeal against a lower court decision regarding the urban planning justification for land-use plan determinations aimed at strengthening central supply areas. The decisive legal basis for this interim decision was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, under which the court found that the revision was necessary to clarify the specific legal requirements for urban planning justifications in the context of bolstering central supply areas, while the relevant dispute values were determined under §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Requirements for Urban Planning Justification of Land-Use Plan Determinations to Strengthen Central Supply Areas: The dispute concerned a complaint for leave to appeal against a lower court decision regarding the urban planning justification for land-use plan determinations aimed at strengthening central supply areas. The decisive legal basis for this interim decision was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, under which the court found that the revision was necessary to clarify the specific legal requirements for urban planning justifications in the context of bolstering central supply areas, while the relevant dispute values were determined under §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
urbanisme motifs de révision zone urbaine utilisation du bien-fonds réclamation administrative obligation de permis de construire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal to clarify the legal requirements for urban planning justifications.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provisions cited for the determination of the dispute value in the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Provisions cited for the preliminary determination of the dispute value in the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
4 BN 24/11, 4 BN 24/11 (4 CN 7/11)
Urban planning justification standards for strengthening central supply areas
4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)
Urban Planning Justification for Strengthening Central Service Areas: Requirements for Land-Use Plan Determinations
4 BN 3/09, 4 BN 3/09 (4 CN 1/10)
Antragsbefugnis for property owner located outside planning area in abstract judicial review of development plan designating land as transport surface
4 B 13/12
Spatial demarcation of central supply areas under § 34(3) BauGB based on factual circumstances versus regional planning objectives
4 BN 5/21, 4 BN 5/21 (4 CN 10/21)
Spatial planning protection of local retail supply in non-central towns under the impairment prohibition

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal to clarify the legal requirements for urban planning justifications.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provisions cited for the determination of the dispute value in the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Provisions cited for the preliminary determination of the dispute value in the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung zentraler Versorgungsbereiche

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.