Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
7 B 30/11, 7 B 30/11 (7 C 30/11) Généré par l'IA

Suitability of Construction Noise Ordinance intervention values for defining outdoor noise tolerance limits for commercial premises

Numéro de cause 7 B 30/11, 7 B 30/11 (7 C 30/11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the defendant's complaint, reversed the lower court's denial of appellate review, and authorized the defendant to file an appeal on the ground of fundamental legal significance. The dispute centers on whether specific noise intervention values from the Construction Noise Ordinance (AVV-Baulärm) are suitable for determining the threshold of unreasonableness (Zumutbarkeitsgrenze) for noise in the outdoor contact areas of retail premises, challenging a protection claim filed under administrative and environmental law. The court relied on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO to admit the appeal, identifying the unresolved question of applying these construction noise standards to commercial outdoor zones under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG in conjunction with § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG as a matter of fundamental legal significance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Suitability of Construction Noise Ordinance intervention values for defining outdoor noise tolerance limits for commercial premises: The dispute centers on whether specific noise intervention values from the Construction Noise Ordinance (AVV-Baulärm) are suitable for determining the threshold of unreasonableness (Zumutbarkeitsgrenze) for noise in the outdoor contact areas of retail premises, challenging a protection claim filed under administrative and environmental law. The court relied on § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO to admit the appeal, identifying the unresolved question of applying these construction noise standards to commercial outdoor zones under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG in conjunction with § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG as a matter of fundamental legal significance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
zone de bruit norme environnementale zone commerciale motif de révision conformité au permis délivré protection juridique

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Provision cited to authorize the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding noise thresholds for commercial premises.
Généré par l'IA
7 B 29/11, 7 B 29/11 (7 C 29/11)
Admissibility of revision on whether AVV-Baulärm intervention values define the noise tolerance threshold for retail spaces under § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG and § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG
7 A 24/11
Construction noise immission thresholds, traffic noise pre-exposure, and compensation limits under the Administrative Regulation on Construction Noise in plan approval proceedings
8 B 36/18
Noise immission tolerance in mixed land-use zones: applicability of intermediate value calculation (Zwischenwertbildung) for non-privileged external area businesses
7 A 12/11
Scope of construction noise compensation under the VwVfG: excluding economic loss from § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 3 and limiting liability to immissions exceeding the AVV Baulärm threshold.
4 BN 6/12
Eligibility of passive noise protection as a balancing measure for residential encroachment on commercial zones

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Provision cited to authorize the appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal question regarding noise thresholds for commercial premises.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Das Revisionsverfahren kann Gelegenheit geben, die Frage zu klären, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen die Eingriffswerte der AVV-Baulärm im Rahmen eines Schutzanspruchs aus § 74 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VwVfG i.V.m. § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 BImSchG geeignet sind, die Zumutbarkeitsgrenze für Lärm im Außenkontaktbereich von Ladengeschäften zu bestimmen.