Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
3 B 34/11, 3 B 34/11 (3 C 31/11) Généré par l'IA

Suspension of Medical License: Lapse of Statutory Prerequisites Upon Final Conclusion of Criminal Proceedings

Numéro de cause 3 B 34/11, 3 B 34/11 (3 C 31/11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the plaintiff's complaint, finding that the lower court's judgment deviated from a prior binding precedent; consequently, the plaintiff prevailed in this admissibility decision for the subsequent revision. The dispute concerned the legality of an authority's order to suspend a medical license (approbation) following the final conclusion of a criminal proceeding. The decisive legal issue centered on § 6(1)(1) of the Federal Physicians Act, where the prior precedent established that the statutory prerequisites for suspension lapse upon the final closure of the criminal case, a principle the lower court had incorrectly rejected.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Suspension of Medical License: Lapse of Statutory Prerequisites Upon Final Conclusion of Criminal Proceedings: The dispute concerned the legality of an authority's order to suspend a medical license (approbation) following the final conclusion of a criminal proceeding. The decisive legal issue centered on § 6(1)(1) of the Federal Physicians Act, where the prior precedent established that the statutory prerequisites for suspension lapse upon the final closure of the criminal case, a principle the lower court had incorrectly rejected.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
révision d'une décision base légale réclamation administrative préalable principe de la légalité retrait de la concession décision préjudicielle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Cited as the procedural basis for admitting the complaint due to a deviation from prior binding case law.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited to authorize the court's decision on the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited in conjunction with other norms to provide the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited to establish the legal framework for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.
Généré par l'IA
3 C 13/19
Suspension of medical license requires concrete danger during pending criminal proceedings, not just probable conviction
3 B 6/11
Revocation of Medical License for Criminal Conduct: Professional Linkage to Medical Practice and Evidentiary Weight of Final Criminal Judgments in Administrative Proceedings
3 B 36/12
Refusal of medical re-licensing: evidentiary standard for restoration of professional dignity and admissibility of revision
1 BvR 722/10
Suspension of immediate execution of medical license revocation: proportionality of general preventive interests versus irreparable professional harm under occupational freedom and effective judicial review.
1 BvR 1657/17
Revocation of medical license: sufficiency of statutory "unfitness" basis and proportionality of occupational freedom restriction

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Cited as the procedural basis for admitting the complaint due to a deviation from prior binding case law.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited in conjunction with other norms to provide the legal basis for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited to establish the legal framework for the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited to authorize the court's decision on the preliminary determination of the amount in dispute for costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Anordnung des Ruhens der Approbation

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist begründet. Das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs weicht im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO von dem Beschluss des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts vom 29. November 2007 - BVerwG 3 C 52.06 - ab. Während dem Beschluss des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts der Rechtssatz zugrunde liegt, dass die gesetzlichen Voraussetzungen für eine Anordnung des Ruhens der Approbation nach § 6 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 der Bundesärzteordnung - BÄO - entfallen, wenn das Strafverfahren rechtskräftig abgeschlossen ist, beruht das angegriffene Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs auf dessen Rechtsauffassung, dass der rechtskräftige Abschluss des Strafverfahrens der Rechtmäßigkeit der Ruhensanordnung nicht entgegensteht.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.