Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
9 B 22/11, 9 B 22/11 (9 C 13/11) Généré par l'IA

Land consolidation: statutory grounds for permitting revision on divergence from case law regarding interim orders

Numéro de cause 9 B 22/11, 9 B 22/11 (9 C 13/11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the appellant's complaint and permitted a revision appeal, finding that the lower court's decision deviated from established case law regarding the requirements for temporary orders in land consolidation proceedings. The dispute concerned a challenge to a provisional directive issued during a land consolidation process, specifically addressing the legal standards for such interim measures under § 36(1) Sentence 1 of the Federal Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG). By allowing the revision on grounds of legal divergence, the court effectively reversed the lower instance's procedural ruling to ensure consistent application of the doctrine governing provisional administrative orders, while the temporary fee settlement was made pursuant to the Court Costs Act.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Land consolidation: statutory grounds for permitting revision on divergence from case law regarding interim orders: The dispute concerned a challenge to a provisional directive issued during a land consolidation process, specifically addressing the legal standards for such interim measures under § 36(1) Sentence 1 of the Federal Land Consolidation Act (FlurbG). By allowing the revision on grounds of legal divergence, the court effectively reversed the lower instance's procedural ruling to ensure consistent application of the doctrine governing provisional administrative orders, while the temporary fee settlement was made pursuant to the Court Costs Act.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
remembrement motifs de révision décisions incidentes motifs légaux recours contre des décisions administratives règlement du litige

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Basis for permitting the revision appeal due to deviation from established case law.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisions governing the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings and associated court costs.
Généré par l'IA
9 B 26/17
Land consolidation: specific requirements for temporary orders and the limits of judicial fact-finding in staged administrative procedures
8 B 1/22
Land consolidation provisional order: denial of continuing declaratory interest where repetition of administrative act realized
9 B 21/18
Land consolidation area delimitation requirements and interplay between annulment and obligation claims under § 8 FlurbG
8 B 3/22
Land consolidation: Admissibility of non-admission of revision and validity of lay judge allocation in simultaneous hearing days
9 B 32/14
Provisional possession order in land consolidation: classification as continuous administrative act under § 36 FlurbG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Basis for permitting the revision appeal due to deviation from established case law.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions governing the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings and associated court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Flurbereinigung; vorläufige Anordnung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO wegen Abweichung des angefochtenen Urteils von der ständigen Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts zu den Voraussetzungen einer vorläufigen Anordnung nach § 36 Abs. 1 Satz 1 FlurbG zuzulassen.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1, 2 und 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.