Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
9 B 5/11 Généré par l'IA

Classification of hunting tax on a public-law corporation as an expenditure tax under Article 105(2a) Basic Law

Numéro de cause 9 B 5/11
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted an appeal on points of law, ruling that the plaintiff's complaint against the lower court's refusal was admissible and well-founded. The dispute concerns the assessment of a hunting tax (Jagdsteuer) on a public-law corporation, specifically a hunting association, challenging its classification as a tax on expenditure. The court determined that the case possesses fundamental legal significance, necessitating appellate review to clarify whether a hunting tax can lawfully be levied on a public-law corporation as a consumption tax (Aufwandsteuer) within the meaning of Article 105(2a) of the German Basic Law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Classification of hunting tax on a public-law corporation as an expenditure tax under Article 105(2a) Basic Law: The dispute concerns the assessment of a hunting tax (Jagdsteuer) on a public-law corporation, specifically a hunting association, challenging its classification as a tax on expenditure. The court determined that the case possesses fundamental legal significance, necessitating appellate review to clarify whether a hunting tax can lawfully be levied on a public-law corporation as a consumption tax (Aufwandsteuer) within the meaning of Article 105(2a) of the German Basic Law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
impôt sur la consommation collectivité publique impôt sur les sociétés taxations fiscales droit fiscal régale de la chasse

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Procedural rule applied to admit the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
Généré par l'IA
9 C 10/11
Jagdsteuerpflicht of Jagdgenossenschaften for non-leased communal hunting districts and applicability of expenditure tax to public-law corporations
9 C 2/12
Municipal exclusion from hunting tax liability under Art. 105(2a) GG due to absence of personal consumption expenditure
9 C 14/16
Hunting tax liability of a nonprofit GmbH: expenditure tax inapplicable to entities exclusively pursuing economic income generation
9 B 70/11, 9 B 70/11 (9 C 2/12)
Municipal game tax as a cost tax: constitutional validity under Art. 105(2a) GG
VI B 92/11
Tax deductibility of hunting exam expenses as income-related costs requiring a demonstrable link to earning income

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Procedural rule applied to admit the appeal on points of law due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Heranziehung einer öffentlich-rechtlichen Körperschaft zur Jagdsteuer

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Klägerin ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Rechtsfrage geben, ob von einer Jagdgenossenschaft als öffentlich-rechtlicher Körperschaft eine Jagdsteuer als Aufwandsteuer i.S.d. Art. 105 Abs. 2a GG erhoben werden darf.