Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
5 B 13/11, 5 B 13/11 (5 C 12/11) Généré par l'IA

Admission of revision on entitlement to foster care allowances for kinship care under §§ 27(2a), 33, 39 SGB VIII

Numéro de cause 5 B 13/11, 5 B 13/11 (5 C 12/11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) 5th Senate granted the plaintiffs' complaint and admitted a revision for the reason that the legal matter has fundamental significance. The dispute concerns educational assistance (Hilfe zur Erziehung), specifically the prerequisites for kinship care and the entitlement to foster care allowances under social law. The court ordered that the lower court’s decision, which denied these claims, is overturned to allow for a definitive ruling on whether the statutory requirements for relative caregiving and corresponding financial support are met in this specific family arrangement. The decisive legal basis consists of §§ 27(2a), 33(1), and 39 of the Eighth Social Code (SGB VIII), which govern the provision and funding of youth welfare services, including the specific conditions under which relatives may receive care allowances instead of institutional placements.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 39 SGB VIII; Admission of revision on entitlement to foster care allowances for kinship care under §§ 27(2a), 33, 39 SGB VIII: The dispute concerns educational assistance (Hilfe zur Erziehung), specifically the prerequisites for kinship care and the entitlement to foster care allowances under social law. The court ordered that the lower court’s decision, which denied these claims, is overturned to allow for a definitive ruling on whether the statutory requirements for relative caregiving and corresponding financial support are met in this specific family arrangement. The decisive legal basis consists of §§ 27(2a), 33(1), and 39 of the Eighth Social Code (SGB VIII), which govern the provision and funding of youth welfare services, including the specific conditions under which relatives may receive care allowances instead of institutional placements.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit à l'aide sociale placement chez des parents nourriciers allocations familiales parenté service social base légale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.
§ 39 SGB VIII
2a, § 33 Satz 1, § 39 SGB VIII Stellung zu nehmen.
Généré par l'IA
B 10 EG 9/15 B
Elterngeld für Pflegeeltern ohne Adoptionspflege: keine analoge Anwendung ohne Regelungslücke; Darlegungserfordernisse der Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde bei Grundsatzrüge
5 C 25/11
Reimbursement Rights for Foster Care Providers After Change of Parental Residence: Scope of SGB VIII §§ 89a(3) and 89e(1)
5 B 16/23, 5 B 16/23 (5 C 5/24)
Reimbursement of foster care costs: Interaction between youth welfare benefits and statutory adoption care
5 C 15/16
Prohibition of offsetting statutory long-term care insurance benefits against youth welfare foster care allowance under § 39 SGB VIII
5 C 25/12
Foster care cost reimbursement: analogical extension of § 89a Abs. 2 SGB VIII to pre-existing local competence and pre-benefit residence determination

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal matter.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Hilfe zur Erziehung; Pflegegeld

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Kläger ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, zu den Voraussetzungen der Verwandtenpflege und der Gewährung von Pflegegeld nach den § 27 Abs. 2a, § 33 Satz 1, § 39 SGB VIII Stellung zu nehmen.