Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
6 B 64/10, 6 B 64/10 (6 C 12/11) Généré par l'IA

Photography of special forces personnel: interference with the general right to personality

Numéro de cause 6 B 64/10, 6 B 64/10 (6 C 12/11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the appellant leave to appeal on the ground that the case holds fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the proceeding to progress to a full substantive review by the 6th Senate. The dispute concerns whether the act of photographing a member of the special forces (GSG 9) constitutes a specific interference with the individual's general right to personality, challenging the adequacy of privacy protections for identifiable security personnel in public. The decisive legal basis involves the interpretation of the general right to personality under constitutional law and the procedural standards for admitting revision under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, specifically focusing on the lack of sufficient existing case law clarification regarding the threshold for intrusive recording of state agents.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 5 ZPO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO; Photography of special forces personnel: interference with the general right to personality: The dispute concerns whether the act of photographing a member of the special forces (GSG 9) constitutes a specific interference with the individual's general right to personality, challenging the adequacy of privacy protections for identifiable security personnel in public. The decisive legal basis involves the interpretation of the general right to personality under constitutional law and the procedural standards for admitting revision under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, specifically focusing on the lack of sufficient existing case law clarification regarding the threshold for intrusive recording of state agents.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
protection de la personnalité droits procéduraux droits fondamentaux personnel militaire motifs de révision exécution

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m.
§ 5 ZPO
§ 5 ZPO; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
§ 5 ZPO und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO
Provisions determining the setting of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
6 C 12/11
Police prohibition of photographing special forces and seizure threat: Press freedom versus anonymity, with publication-stage controls satisfying proportionality.
VI ZR 1328/20
Permissibility of publishing an unredacted photo of a police officer wearing controversial symbols during a deployment, balancing press freedom against the right to personality under contemporary history exceptions
1 BvR 2112/15
Conflict between freedom of art and right to personality in large-scale public street photography
VI ZR 57/21
Whether publication of a police officer’s identifiable image wearing right-wing patches during a counter-demonstration unlawfully infringes personality rights by asserting extremist affiliation
VI ZR 22/21
Image publication of police officer wearing controversial patches during duty: Balancing public interest in police neutrality against personality rights under contemporary history exception

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the revision due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO

Provisions determining the setting of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisions determining the preliminary amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Fotografieren eines SEK-Beamten

[GRUENDE]

1. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Das angestrebte Revisionsverfahren kann zur Beantwortung der bisher in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts nicht ausreichend geklärten Frage beitragen, ob bereits das Fotografieren einen speziellen Eingriff in das allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht eines SEK-Beamten darstellt.

2. Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG i.V.m. § 5 ZPO und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.