Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
6 B 43/10, 6 B 43/10 (6 C 8/11) Généré par l'IA

Challengeability of examination awards: legal basis for appealing the assessment and grading of examination components

Numéro de cause 6 B 43/10, 6 B 43/10 (6 C 8/11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (6th Senate) granted leave to appeal, allowing the applicant's revision against the examination board's decision to proceed to the substantive review stage. The dispute concerned the challengeability of examination awards, specifically regarding the assessment and grading of examination components. The court found that the case raised a question of fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as it required further clarification on the legal framework for challenging examination results. Consequently, the lower instance's non-acceptance of the revision was overturned, and the matter is set for decision on the merits by the Senate, with the value in dispute determined pursuant to §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Challengeability of examination awards: legal basis for appealing the assessment and grading of examination components: The dispute concerned the challengeability of examination awards, specifically regarding the assessment and grading of examination components. The court found that the case raised a question of fundamental significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, as it required further clarification on the legal framework for challenging examination results. Consequently, the lower instance's non-acceptance of the revision was overturned, and the matter is set for decision on the merits by the Senate, with the value in dispute determined pursuant to §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
examen au fond demande de révision règlement d'examen objet du litige décision-cadre recours contre des décisions administratives

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Served as the main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the question regarding the challengeability of examination awards.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Used to determine the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Used to determine the preliminary value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
6 B 7/11
Legality of exam grading standards and adequacy of right-to-be-heard compliance in judicial review of professional examinations
6 B 18/11
Examination grading discretion and limits of judicial review of assessment faults
6 B 148/18
Arbitrary change of grading system in state exam reconsideration and limits of revisional review of witness evaluation
6 B 36/11
Grading a legal exam performance as "unsatisfactory" despite positive elements: scope of judicial review and duty to justify
6 B 14/16
Re-evaluation of state law examination: strictness of examiner statements in re-consideration procedures and prohibition of contradictory grading justifications

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Served as the main ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the question regarding the challengeability of examination awards.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Used to determine the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Used to determine the preliminary value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; grundsätzliche Bedeutung; Anfechtbarkeit von Prüfungsbescheiden

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Antragstellerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der Anfechtbarkeit von Prüfungsbescheiden im Hinblick auf die Bewertung von Prüfungsteilen weiter zu klären.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.