Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
9 B 50/10, 9 B 50/10 (9 C 2/11) Généré par l'IA

Revisionszulassung regarding assessment of subsequent administrative act form when initial decision was issued by a private law entity in municipal self-management

Numéro de cause 9 B 50/10, 9 B 50/10 (9 C 2/11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The defendant's complaint was successful, resulting in the Federal Administrative Court's admission of the plaintiff's appeal for revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal issue. The dispute concerns a challenge to an administrative act in a matter of local self-management, where the initial decision was issued solely by a private law entity rather than the originating authority, and the case proceeds to determine whether the form assumed by the original decision after a subsequent objection affects liability or procedural standing. The decisive legal basis is Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Code (VwGO), which permits admission of revision when a question of law has fundamental significance, specifically addressing the interaction between municipal self-governance entities and the procedural status of administrative acts.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Revisionszulassung regarding assessment of subsequent administrative act form when initial decision was issued by a private law entity in municipal self-management: The dispute concerns a challenge to an administrative act in a matter of local self-management, where the initial decision was issued solely by a private law entity rather than the originating authority, and the case proceeds to determine whether the form assumed by the original decision after a subsequent objection affects liability or procedural standing. The decisive legal basis is Section 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Code (VwGO), which permits admission of revision when a question of law has fundamental significance, specifically addressing the interaction between municipal self-governance entities and the procedural status of administrative acts.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
actes administratifs révision procédurale statut juridique qualité pour recourir collectivité locale objet du litige

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for the decision, explicitly cited to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural rules explicitly cited in the dispositive to determine the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
9 C 2/11
Delegation of administrative act issuance to private agent: attribution requirements and limits of supervisory authority’s review competence in self-administration matters
9 B 82/14
Admissibility of revision challenge to case-law change on annual accounting of recurring street construction contributions and municipal self-administration limits
3 B 12/10, 3 B 12/10 (3 C 23/10)
Admission of revision on requirements for public-law contract altering sovereign authority transfer
4 BN 3/16, 4 BN 3/16 (4 CN 3/17)
Revisionszulassung: Bodenrechtliche Relevanz der Kosten- und Finanzierungsübersicht bei der Sanierungsbeschlussfassung
9 B 44/14
Judicial review of indeterminate legal terms in municipal fee assessments and limits of municipal self-governance

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the decision, explicitly cited to justify the admission of the revision due to the fundamental importance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rules explicitly cited in the dispositive to determine the provisional amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Revisionszulassung; kommunale Selbstverwaltungsangelegenheit

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit geben zur Klärung der Frage, ob auch dann auf die Gestalt, die ein Erstbescheid durch den Widerspruchsbescheid erhält, abzustellen ist, wenn der Erstbescheid inhaltlich nicht von der Ausgangsbehörde, sondern allein von einer juristischen Person des Privatrechts in einer kommunalen Selbstverwaltungsangelegenheit verantwortet worden ist.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 3, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.