Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
2 B 19/10, 2 B 19/10 (2 C 4/11) Généré par l'IA

Recoupment of overpaid civil service benefits: Discretionary equity assessment and criteria for reducing clawback amounts

Numéro de cause 2 B 19/10, 2 B 19/10 (2 C 4/11)
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Allemagne (DE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted permission for the appeal to be heard on the merits, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the next instance for substantive review. The dispute concerns the recoupment of overpaid benefits by a civil servant, specifically challenging the administrative authority's discretionary assessment under the principle of equity. The pivotal legal issues identified for resolution include whether the court can compel a significant reduction in the clawback amount based on the agency's predominant responsibility for the overpayment, the officer's impoverishment, and the nature of long-term payments involving small individual sums, and whether erroneous equity considerations mandate the full or partial annulment of the recoupment notice, grounded in § 12 Abs. 2 Satz 3 BBesG and § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Recoupment of overpaid civil service benefits: Discretionary equity assessment and criteria for reducing clawback amounts: The dispute concerns the recoupment of overpaid benefits by a civil servant, specifically challenging the administrative authority's discretionary assessment under the principle of equity. The pivotal legal issues identified for resolution include whether the court can compel a significant reduction in the clawback amount based on the agency's predominant responsibility for the overpayment, the officer's impoverishment, and the nature of long-term payments involving small individual sums, and whether erroneous equity considerations mandate the full or partial annulment of the recoupment notice, grounded in § 12 Abs. 2 Satz 3 BBesG and § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
paiement des prestations fonction publique salaire dû à l'employé examen sur le fond détournement de retenues sur les salaires montant à libre disposition

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Legal basis cited in the dispositive for permitting the revision (appeal) because it serves the unification of case law.
Généré par l'IA
2 C 24/17
Recovery of overpaid civil service pension: discretion to demand full repayment without fault reduction and constitutionality of falling below minimum pension floor due to family-law equalization or debt repayment.
2 C 4/11
Recovery of overpaid civil servant allowances: impact of administrative error and consumption on equitable discretion under § 12 Abs. 2 BBesG
2 C 7/19
Immanent recoupment reservation in statutory crediting of other allowances triggering strict liability for overpaid civil service remuneration
2 C 15/10
Recovery of overpaid civil service allowances: binding effect of the fairness assessment on the validity of the recovery order
5 C 5/16
Recovery of overpaid civil servant benefits: Attribution of third-party receipt and equitable discretion under § 12 BBesG

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Legal basis cited in the dispositive for permitting the revision (appeal) because it serves the unification of case law.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Beamte; Rückforderung von Bezügen

[GRUENDE]

Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren gibt Gelegenheit , Voraussetzungen der Rückforderung überzahlter Bezüge näher zu präzisieren. Insbesondere könnte es zur Klärung der Fragen beitragen, ob das Gericht die Behörde bei der Billigkeitsprüfung im Rahmen des § 12 Abs. 2 Satz 3 BBesG verpflichten kann, den Rückforderungsbetrag erheblich zu reduzieren, ob hierbei die Kriterien überwiegende Verantwortung der Behörde für die Überzahlung, Entreicherung des Beamten und jahrelange Überzahlung mit jeweils geringen Einzelbeträgen ausschlaggebend sein dürfen und ob bei unzutreffenden Billigkeitserwägungen ein Rückforderungsbescheid ganz oder teilweise aufzuheben ist.